On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:41:59 GMT, David wrote:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:21:54 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:14:53 GMT, David wrote:


Sir Winston Churchill, from The River War, first edition, Vol. II,
pages 248-50 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899).

Another crazed white guy.


This "crazed white guy" (as you call him) helped to save the world
from the nazis. I guess you don't like that he did that, do you?
I wonder where you live?

And I suppose you also sympathize with the islamic terrorists?

Peter Newman

Then you suppose erroneously.

In that case, explain this "another crazed white guy" reply of yours.
Do I suppose correctly that perhaps you are not white and are not
entirely happy about your colour? Would it be also perhaps correct to
assume that you are a racist?

The ****ing English in large part created the Middle East mess. Don't
give me that tired old Churchill crap.


The English certainly did not create Al Qaeda. And that "old tired
Churchill" description of Islam is certainly more fitting than
anything that any politician of today would dare to say publicly.

The problem of today is Islam and its crazed Muslims - certainly not
"crazed white guys".

Peter Newman

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:11:21 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


The problem of today is Islam and its crazed Muslims - certainly not
"crazed white guys".

Peter Newman

The problem today is people refusing to live within their means, both
personally and nationally.

The problem today is people see the differences between one another,
not the similarities.

If you want to defeat the jihadists you do not attack their religion.
You stop giving them reasons to kill you.

Bono is right. If the West would use their riches to truly help the
starving and infirm (most of whom are incidently Muslim), while
cutting back on the greed and gluttony at home that forces us to kill
for oil, then the jihadists wouldn't be able to recruit.

Peter Newman wrote:
Folks, here is an interesting (and in my view brilliant) excerpt from
a book by Sir Winston Churchill. He wrote this in 1899, when he was 25
years old.

I apologise for posting this as this is not exactly related to radio,
but given the existing world situation with Islam, I thought that I
would share this.

Peter Newman

------------------------------------------


"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as
hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The
effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly
systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity
of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement;
the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law
every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either
as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among
men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the
influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those
who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far
from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing
faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising
fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is
sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it
had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as
fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."

Sir Winston Churchill, from The River War, first edition, Vol. II,
pages 248-50 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899).

That was written during the time that Britain and Russia were engaged
in "The Great Game", or a contest of imperial superpowers to acquire
large stretches of land in central asia.

David wrote:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:11:21 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:

The problem of today is Islam and its crazed Muslims - certainly not
"crazed white guys".

Peter Newman

The problem today is people refusing to live within their means, both
personally and nationally.

Really? Or is it simply jealousy on your part, 'tard boy?

The problem today is people see the differences between one another,
not the similarities.

Speak for yourself, 'tard boy.

If you want to defeat the jihadists you do not attack their religion.
You stop giving them reasons to kill you.

They are using their 'religion' as a reason to KILL YOU, 'tard boy.

Bono is right.

Bono is a passable musician. Other than that, he's just another 'tard boy.

If the West would use their riches to truly help the
starving and infirm (most of whom are incidently Muslim), while
cutting back on the greed and gluttony at home that forces us to kill
for oil, then the jihadists wouldn't be able to recruit.

Aha... more income re-distribution, eh, Komrade 'tard boy?

LMAO at the clueless 'tard yet again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

"John S." wrote:

Peter Newman wrote:
Folks, here is an interesting (and in my view brilliant) excerpt from
a book by Sir Winston Churchill. He wrote this in 1899, when he was 25
years old.

I apologise for posting this as this is not exactly related to radio,
but given the existing world situation with Islam, I thought that I
would share this.

Peter Newman

------------------------------------------


"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as
hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The
effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly
systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity
of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement;
the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law
every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either
as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among
men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the
influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those
who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far
from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing
faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising
fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is
sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it
had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as
fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."

Sir Winston Churchill, from The River War, first edition, Vol. II,
pages 248-50 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899).

That was written during the time that Britain and Russia were engaged
in "The Great Game", or a contest of imperial superpowers to acquire
large stretches of land in central asia.

Actually, 'The River War' deals with his experiences in the Sudan, which most of
us know is in Africa, rather than Asia.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:43:53 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



If the West would use their riches to truly help the
starving and infirm (most of whom are incidently Muslim), while
cutting back on the greed and gluttony at home that forces us to kill
for oil, then the jihadists wouldn't be able to recruit.

Aha... more income re-distribution, eh, Komrade 'tard boy?

LMAO at the clueless 'tard yet again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

''Income redistribution''?

Like giving billions and billions to Halliburton?

Think of meaningful foreign aid as another kind of defense spending.

Big problems require radical solutions. Otherwise, we will all go
down together.

David wrote:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:43:53 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



If the West would use their riches to truly help the
starving and infirm (most of whom are incidently Muslim), while
cutting back on the greed and gluttony at home that forces us to kill
for oil, then the jihadists wouldn't be able to recruit.

Aha... more income re-distribution, eh, Komrade 'tard boy?

LMAO at the clueless 'tard yet again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

''Income redistribution''?

Like giving billions and billions to Halliburton?

Think of meaningful foreign aid as another kind of defense spending.

Big problems require radical solutions. Otherwise, we will all go
down together.

I ain't going down anywhere with you, 'tard boy!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

"David" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:43:53 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



If the West would use their riches to truly help the
starving and infirm (most of whom are incidently Muslim), while
cutting back on the greed and gluttony at home that forces us to kill
for oil, then the jihadists wouldn't be able to recruit.

Aha... more income re-distribution, eh, Komrade 'tard boy?

LMAO at the clueless 'tard yet again.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

''Income redistribution''?

Like giving billions and billions to Halliburton?

Think of meaningful foreign aid as another kind of defense spending.

Big problems require radical solutions. Otherwise, we will all go
down together.


You know why HB gets the work? Because their the only MFs that can handle
projects of the size their getting.

B.H.

I ain't going down anywhere with you, 'tard boy!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm


In flames, Sweetheart. In flames.

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:31:49 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:




You know why HB gets the work? Because their the only MFs that can handle
projects of the size their getting.

B.H.

Cheney and Herbert Bush set the whole deal up. It's a scam.

$60 dollars a day per soldier for spoiled food.

Sailboat fuel convoys.

Billions of dollars missing.

During WW2 there was commission to provide oversight and prevent
profiteering, set up by a Democratic congress to oversee a Democratic
president. Republicans have no intention of checking up on their own.
They are swine.