On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 02:54:48 GMT, m II wrote:

Peter Newman wrote:

So why'd we invade Iraq?


To get rid of Saddam Husein and his Baath party.


The Administration went to great lengths to explain that regime change was NOT
the reason for invasion. That would have been illegal under UN rules. Weapons of
Mass Destruction were the justification.

These weapons were located East, West, North, South and a little North West of
Baghdad. Remember? It was a 'Slam Dunk'..

Herr Rumsfeldt claimed to know where they were.

Bush lied, thousands died.

He let 9-11 happen so he could put his brother's warped plan for world
domination into action.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:55:32 GMT, m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:



From: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/...k/geos/su.html

dxAce


When did the CIA become an accurate reporter of world facts? We're going to need
a more credible source. It's the Iraq fiasco, you understand...

The CIA used to be reliable. I wouldn't trust them since John ''Mr.
Burns'' Negroponte became superspook.

"m II" wrote in message
news:YNXFe.152187$9A2.54346@edtnps89...
Peter Newman wrote:

So why'd we invade Iraq?


To get rid of Saddam Husein and his Baath party.


The Administration went to great lengths to explain that regime
change was NOT
the reason for invasion. That would have been illegal under UN
rules. Weapons of
Mass Destruction were the justification.

These weapons were located East, West, North, South and a little
North West of
Baghdad. Remember? It was a 'Slam Dunk'..

Actually, regime change was one of the big reasons
touted in the US in the last couple of months leading
up to the invasion. It was in the background for a
while, but it came to the forefront when people wanted
another explanation other than WMD.

--Mike L.

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:57 -0400, "Michael Lawson"
wrote:



"m II" wrote in message
news:YNXFe.152187$9A2.54346@edtnps89...
Peter Newman wrote:

So why'd we invade Iraq?


To get rid of Saddam Husein and his Baath party.


The Administration went to great lengths to explain that regime
change was NOT
the reason for invasion. That would have been illegal under UN
rules. Weapons of
Mass Destruction were the justification.

These weapons were located East, West, North, South and a little
North West of
Baghdad. Remember? It was a 'Slam Dunk'..

Actually, regime change was one of the big reasons
touted in the US in the last couple of months leading
up to the invasion. It was in the background for a
while, but it came to the forefront when people wanted
another explanation other than WMD.

--Mike L.


Huh! I remeber Cheney and Dominatrix Condi Rice and their ''smoking
gun in the shape of a throbbing mushroom cloud''. I remember poor
Colin Powell waving a bottle of Anthrax at the U.N.

Herr Wolfowitz says they used WMD as a reason because ''regime
change'' wouldn't fly with the peeps.

The Valerie Wilson deal, the Downing Street Minutes, Bolton, etc. are
all the same story. Bush lied us into war.

"David" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:00:57 -0400, "Michael Lawson"
wrote:



"m II" wrote in message
news:YNXFe.152187$9A2.54346@edtnps89...
Peter Newman wrote:

So why'd we invade Iraq?


To get rid of Saddam Husein and his Baath party.


The Administration went to great lengths to explain that regime
change was NOT
the reason for invasion. That would have been illegal under UN
rules. Weapons of
Mass Destruction were the justification.

These weapons were located East, West, North, South and a little
North West of
Baghdad. Remember? It was a 'Slam Dunk'..

Actually, regime change was one of the big reasons
touted in the US in the last couple of months leading
up to the invasion. It was in the background for a
while, but it came to the forefront when people wanted
another explanation other than WMD.

--Mike L.


Huh! I remeber Cheney and Dominatrix Condi Rice and their ''smoking
gun in the shape of a throbbing mushroom cloud''. I remember poor
Colin Powell waving a bottle of Anthrax at the U.N.

Herr Wolfowitz says they used WMD as a reason because ''regime
change'' wouldn't fly with the peeps.

The Valerie Wilson deal, the Downing Street Minutes, Bolton, etc.
are
all the same story. Bush lied us into war.

I remember the "what will it take to get us to call off the
invasion?" question posed to members of the
Administration, and the response was "regime change".

--Mike L.

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:35:50 -0400, "Michael Lawson"
wrote:


all the same story. Bush lied us into war.

I remember the "what will it take to get us to call off the
invasion?" question posed to members of the
Administration, and the response was "regime change".

--Mike L.


Saddam was willing to go to a neutral country. He was not allowed to
leave.

They want Iraq for bases to attack Iran. They have a warped plan to
eventually attack the Chinese and take over the world. They think
they have God on their side and that they can lie all they want. They
are dangerously insane.

They think they have God on their side and that they can lie all
they want .

Brings to mind something Mr. Zimmerman wrote, circa 1962:

Oh my name it is nothin
My age it means less
The country I come from
Is called the midwest
Its taught and brought up there
The laws to abide
And that land that I live in
Has God on its side.

Oh the history books tell it
They tell it so well
The cavalries charged
The indians fell
The cavalries charged
The indians died
Oh the country was young
With God on its side.

Oh the spanish-american
War had its day
And the civil war too
Was soon laid away
And the names of the heroes
Is made to memorize
With guns in their hands
And God on their side.

Oh the first world war, boys
It closed out its fate
The reason for fighting
I never got straight
But I learned to accept it
Accept it with pride
For you dont count the dead
When God's on your side.

When the second world war
Came to an end
We forgave the germans
And we were friends
Though they murdered six million
In the ovens they fried
The germans now too
Have God on their side.

I've learned to hate russians
All through my whole life
If another war starts
Its them we must fight
To hate them and fear them
To run and to hide
And accept it all bravely
With God on my side.

But now we got weapons
Of the chemical dust
If fire them were forced to
Then fire them we must
One push of the button
And a shot the world wide
And you never ask questions
When God's on your side.

In a many dark hour
I've been thinkin about this
That Jesus Christ
Was betrayed by a kiss
But I cant think for you
You'll have to decide
Whether Judas Iscariot
Had God on his side.

So now as I'm leavin
I'm weary as hell
The confusion I'm feelin
Ain't no tongue can tell
The words fill my head
And fall to the floor
If God's on our side
He'll stop the next war.

David wrote:

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 01:55:32 GMT, m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:



From: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/...k/geos/su.html

dxAce


When did the CIA become an accurate reporter of world facts? We're going to need
a more credible source. It's the Iraq fiasco, you understand...

The CIA used to be reliable. I wouldn't trust them since John ''Mr.
Burns'' Negroponte became superspook.

They're most likely more trustworthy than you are, 'tard boy!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:15:27 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:

As far as I know, the world
(including the English) are *buying* oil from the Arabs. For high
prices. And the Arabs, instead of them using their fortune wisely, are
mostly wasting it.

WRONG! We prop up dictators who do not share the bounty with the
people.

And don't you realize that without these "crazy white men", the Arabs
would not even know that oil exists and what to do with it?
\
That probably would have worked-out better

But I was especially angry that Geoge Bush appointed another Howdy
Doodie looking cracker for the Supreme Nazi Court.

Frankly, I don't think you truly understand what "Nazi" means. I wish
you had to spend just one day under a real Nazi regime, to start fully
appreciating the society you have the priviledge living in. (Which
many other people would kill for, and which you don't deserve.)

Nationalist Socialist Fascist Corporatist Rich ****s Rule

In a Nazi society, you would go to a concentration camp for just
speaking against it. You really have no idea what you are talking
about.

http://www.esr.org/outreach/climate_...t/co2_temp.jpg

Global warming cyclical, says climate expert
By Philip Hopkins
June 13, 2005

Carbon dioxide is not a harmful gas and has helped produce the "green"
world agricultural revolution, according to an Australian climate
expert.

Rob Carter, from James Cook University in Townsville, said the rising
level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in recent decades had
boosted agricultural crop yields.

"Carbon dioxide is the best aerial fertiliser we know about," he told
the Victorian Farmers Federation in Morwell late last week.

Professor Carter, a marine geologist, is research professor in the
university's Marine Geophysical Laboratory.

http://planetforlife.com/gwarm/glob1000.html

Blame it on the moo cows, then.

You're going down, Whitey.

Guess I'll just ask again... What colour are you? Are you a 'darkie'? If so,
what brand?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

DX Ace - Why DaviD is a RainBow of Colours
In 'his' Own Mind that Is . . . ~ RHF
. . . . .