| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:05:19 -0400, "Lucky"
wrote: I won't pay for the service either. I can find all the music I want on FM or on the net. Radio waves were meant to be free for listeners with commercials supporting the station. To me, this sat radio business is a created offspring of radio that has been hyped too much. But from many people who have the service, they say they'll never go back to "old style FM" again. I surely won't pay $13 or $15 a month for it. If it was like $3 a month, I'd try it. Lucky You are indeed ''Lucky'' if you can get clean FM stereo where you live. I cannot. Like millions of people in the Western part of the USA, mountains and multipath destroy the FM stereo at my house. Is this the 11th Commandment, or what: ''Radio waves were meant to be free for listeners with commercials supporting the station'' The first commercial stations were signed on so stores could sell radios. Very similar to the satellite radio business model. Here's the deal: you pay for ****ty radio every time you buy a Coke. Quit buying Cokes and listen to better radio. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Thoughts on the demise of the former BBC/DW Caribbean Relay Station... | Broadcasting | |||
| Sony 7600GR any thoughts? | Shortwave | |||
| ANY THOUGHTS ON THE GRUNDIG YB-550? | Shortwave | |||
| Thoughts on odd behaviour of 10m vertical | Antenna | |||
| Initial thoughts on my new 909 | Shortwave | |||