Professor FRASER in BRIEF identified a group of black skinned
individuals and told Australians they had IQs under 70 and he also
identified Asians as overperformers and then suggested that both these
groups should not be Australians. He also admitted to being involved
with at least two well known EXTREME RACIST GROUPS but claimed he was
not a member of either.

In my mind when you target a RACE and place all members of that race in
a group that is inferior or superior to you, you have fitted the OED
definition of a RACIST. If it is further shown that you MIX with
Extreme Racist Groups well what more does one say about his attitude to
other RACES.

I know that you have some strange views of people who call others a
RACIST because did you not say once; (Aug 12th to be exact)

"Labelling him a RACIST and attacking him personally only proves that
what he says has merit and his oponents have no rational means of
reply."

So to your logic if someone makes a RACIST statement that person cannot
be called a RACIST because when someone calls him a RACIST it proves
his RACIST statement had MERIT.

Is that what you said jOHN?????????????

Charlie

----------------------------------------------


The definition of a racist is clear. If you believe the GOOD PROFESSOR
is correct, it can only lead to the FACT that both you and the GOOD
PROFESSOR are RACISTS.

Does the fact that he has suggested Australia's migration policies
are in need of an overhaul to bring them up-to-date and his belief that
multiculturalism has failed, make him a racist?

Does that fact that I also believe this and have said so, make me a
racist?

It is your belief in the superority of your RACE that makes you a
RACIST.

I have not stated anywhere that my race is superior. Yet you call me a
racist.

We are all members of the HUMAN RACE John. No sub set of the Human Race
is, as a subset greater or lesser than any other.

Is this and extension of your wonderous statement "we are all one
human race divided up into five races"?

Please go look up the UN 30 Articles of The Universal Declaration of
Human Rights and tell me which ones you REJECT.

Only you have introduced Human Rights into the discussion as a
diversion and in a childish attempt to impress Human rights are not at
issue here.

OH I ask again: Have you ever been in a WAR? Third request for a
response.

There's that unhealthy question again.

John

----------------------



http://www.aussieseek.com