Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 13th 05, 03:11 PM
SeeingEyeDog
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 04:34:07 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:



"David" wrote
They went to war to stop Saddam from selling the oil.


and to stop the U.N. Oil-for-Fraud program.


That program was ending. Saddam was going to open the gates.


LOL - your not weird, your delusional


BTW: The USA's hands are very dirty in your aforementioned program.


And is the only nation to have begun prosecution procedures against those
involved U.S. individuals.
You even decided to omit the fact, like usual, that the most blatant
violations occurred under Impeached "c"lintoon's watch.
Of course your propaganda bureau chief wouldn't allow you to mention that
nicely concealed fact now would they?

Weird, indeed.



  #2   Report Post  
Old August 13th 05, 03:36 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:11:16 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:



"David" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 04:34:07 -0500, "SeeingEyeDog"
wrote:



"David" wrote
They went to war to stop Saddam from selling the oil.


and to stop the U.N. Oil-for-Fraud program.


That program was ending. Saddam was going to open the gates.


LOL - your not weird, your delusional


BTW: The USA's hands are very dirty in your aforementioned program.


And is the only nation to have begun prosecution procedures against those
involved U.S. individuals.
You even decided to omit the fact, like usual, that the most blatant
violations occurred under Impeached "c"lintoon's watch.
Of course your propaganda bureau chief wouldn't allow you to mention that
nicely concealed fact now would they?

Weird, indeed.


I'm no fan of Clinton. But he was a lot less dangerous than the
current bunch of lunatics.

  #3   Report Post  
Old August 14th 05, 03:10 PM
SeeingEyeDog
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David" wrote

Weird, indeed.


I'm no fan of Clinton. But he was a lot less dangerous than the
current bunch of lunatics.


Is that your senseless opinion or do you have legitimate facts from
legitimate sources that you can quote and link to for the benefit of all of
us?

Anyone in the pinnacle of high office that easily succumbs to immoral carnal
sexual desires with an intern young enough to be his daughter shows
extremely dangerous character. But knowing your morals I don't expect you
to understand that fact.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017