LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old August 18th 05, 06:29 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default


This is true, although perhaps obvious.. Now you have the problem of a
nonlinear device at the antenna input. If he lives in an urban area, it is
an invite to horrible IM and crossmod problems. Usually not considered good
engineeering practice.
A better solution might be to forget tuning the whip input and use a high
IP3 amplifier as in the Amrad project, or use a simple stepper motor to turn
an air variable cap.

Dale W4OP

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Dale
I am presently constructing the Amrad Active Antenna with the specified
parts.
I am kind of in the Burbs but I can see a small mountain about 10 miles
airline that has an FM, 93.1mhz, station, UHF tv, channel 40, station
and who knows what else.
I found plans on building a MW phaser using loop and/or active
antennas. I suspect the Amrad will be the better active antenna. This
will bre a learning process for sure.

Richard

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Info 0 October 24th 04 09:22 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 0 July 6th 03 10:10 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 0 July 6th 03 10:10 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 July 6th 03 10:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017