| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is true, although perhaps obvious.. Now you have the problem of a nonlinear device at the antenna input. If he lives in an urban area, it is an invite to horrible IM and crossmod problems. Usually not considered good engineeering practice. A better solution might be to forget tuning the whip input and use a high IP3 amplifier as in the Amrad project, or use a simple stepper motor to turn an air variable cap. Dale W4OP ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Dale I am presently constructing the Amrad Active Antenna with the specified parts. I am kind of in the Burbs but I can see a small mountain about 10 miles airline that has an FM, 93.1mhz, station, UHF tv, channel 40, station and who knows what else. I found plans on building a MW phaser using loop and/or active antennas. I suspect the Amrad will be the better active antenna. This will bre a learning process for sure. Richard |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Info | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #617 | General | |||