Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 28th 05, 10:56 PM
Brian Hill
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rickets, The enemy of world democracy.

It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its
way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and
everything that would help to stop it. I like how the opposition to the war
screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the
first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war
with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between
1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war
combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only
people looked at the numbers and the stats.

B.H.


  #2   Report Post  
Old August 29th 05, 12:47 PM
Chameleon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:34 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:

He'll you can barely call it a war
with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between
1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war
combined.


How noble, how ****ing noble!


  #3   Report Post  
Old August 29th 05, 11:35 PM
Carter-K8VT
 
Posts: n/a
Default


On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:34 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:


He'll you can barely call it a war
with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between
1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war
combined.



Uh, haven't you overlooked a little something? Aren't those ~14,000 kids
with arms, legs and other various missing body parts also "losses"?
  #4   Report Post  
Old August 29th 05, 11:48 PM
Brian Hill
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Carter-K8VT" wrote in message
.. .

On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:34 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:


He'll you can barely call it a war with only 1800 losses in over three
years. We lost more men between 1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from
normal operations and the Gulf war combined.



Uh, haven't you overlooked a little something? Aren't those ~14,000 kids
with arms, legs and other various missing body parts also "losses"?


Yea it's a shame. You can't stop them from doing what they believe in
Carter. Do you not agree? This war isn't going to stop and a lot of us are
for it. Including the majority our troops. Theres nothing you can do but
complain.

B.H.


  #5   Report Post  
Old August 30th 05, 12:32 AM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:48:52 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:


Yea it's a shame. You can't stop them from doing what they believe in
Carter. Do you not agree? This war isn't going to stop and a lot of us are
for it. Including the majority our troops. Theres nothing you can do but
complain.

B.H.


You may think your actions are meaningless and that they won't help,
but that is no excuse, you must still act. -- Mohandas Karamchand
Gandhi



  #6   Report Post  
Old August 30th 05, 12:36 AM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David wrote:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:48:52 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:


Yea it's a shame. You can't stop them from doing what they believe in
Carter. Do you not agree? This war isn't going to stop and a lot of us are
for it. Including the majority our troops. Theres nothing you can do but
complain.

B.H.


You may think your actions are meaningless and that they won't help,
but that is no excuse, you must still act. -- Mohandas Karamchand
Gandhi


I don't think he meant to act stupid, like you do, 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #7   Report Post  
Old August 29th 05, 03:34 PM
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:56:34 -0500, "Brian Hill"
wrote:


It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its
way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and
everything that would help to stop it. I like how the opposition to the war
screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the
first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war
with only 1800 losses in over three years. We lost more men between
1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war
combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only
people looked at the numbers and the stats.

B.H.


This has nothing to do with numbers.

It has everything to do with making things worse. It has to do with
creating new generations of enemies.

The United States should lead the world by example. Not like a ****ty
parent who says ''do as I say, not as I do''.

  #8   Report Post  
Old August 29th 05, 04:04 PM
John S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Brian Hill wrote:
It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its
way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and
everything that would help to stop it.


Who is he.....
Which government...



I like how the opposition to the war
screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the
first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war
with only 1800 losses in over three years.


Who is he......
1,800 people seems like a lot of people to have die needlessly, and the
number is a lot higher if you include contractors and other
nationalities. And how could we forget the tens of thougnds of Iraqis
who have been killed so far. I'm certain the parents and loved ones of
those killed would think the losses were of some significance, wouldn't
you?

We lost more men between
1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war
combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only
people looked at the numbers and the stats.


And that justifies the invasion of a soverign country? It must,
because the Bush administration has given no other credible
justification.

George Bush is goiung to do just what Lyndon Johnson did in Viet Nam -
leave the cleanup and inevtiable messy exit to another president.
That's a fine legacy George!!




B.H.


  #9   Report Post  
Old August 29th 05, 04:12 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"John S." wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:
It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its
way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and
everything that would help to stop it.


Who is he.....
Which government...

I like how the opposition to the war
screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the
first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war
with only 1800 losses in over three years.


Who is he......
1,800 people seems like a lot of people to have die needlessly, and the
number is a lot higher if you include contractors and other
nationalities. And how could we forget the tens of thougnds of Iraqis
who have been killed so far. I'm certain the parents and loved ones of
those killed would think the losses were of some significance, wouldn't
you?

We lost more men between
1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war
combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only
people looked at the numbers and the stats.


And that justifies the invasion of a soverign country? It must,
because the Bush administration has given no other credible
justification.


Yada, yada, yada... more left-wing propaganda. Plenty of justification out threre,
'tard. It's just that you and your minions continually dismiss it as false.

If you can't come up with anything better you'd best be prepared to lose a lot of
nationwide elections in 2006 and 2008.

George Bush is goiung to do just what Lyndon Johnson did in Viet Nam -
leave the cleanup and inevtiable messy exit to another president.
That's a fine legacy George!!


Rather than let him leave the cleanup to someone else would you support changing
things so that GWB could run again in 2008? That would give you at least one less
thing to whine about, wouldn't it?

dxAce
Michigan
USA


  #10   Report Post  
Old August 29th 05, 07:43 PM
John S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default


dxAce wrote:
"John S." wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:
It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its
way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and
everything that would help to stop it.


Who is he.....
Which government...

I like how the opposition to the war
screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the
first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war
with only 1800 losses in over three years.


Who is he......
1,800 people seems like a lot of people to have die needlessly, and the
number is a lot higher if you include contractors and other
nationalities. And how could we forget the tens of thougnds of Iraqis
who have been killed so far. I'm certain the parents and loved ones of
those killed would think the losses were of some significance, wouldn't
you?

We lost more men between
1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war
combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only
people looked at the numbers and the stats.


And that justifies the invasion of a soverign country? It must,
because the Bush administration has given no other credible
justification.


Yada, yada, yada... more left-wing propaganda. Plenty of justification out threre,
'tard. It's just that you and your minions continually dismiss it as false.


Well, lets look at the record so far. We are for all intents and
purposes still in charge of a country that has just regained its
position as the largest single producer of opium. And George isn't
even getting a piece of the action. Just more dead. Great job so far
George.

And of course we are in charge of another country, but I keep
forgetting the reason we are there. Oh, yes...we are still hoping for
weapons of mass destruction but more recently we also decided to
install democracy. Or did George change the reason once more this
week. And in the meanwhile the average citizen has numerous miltia
groups to worry about, minimal utilities and a crumbling
infrastructure, a US installed government that is imploding and roving
gangs that break into houses, shoot or imprison people and stop cars at
will. The average citizen of that country sees the U.S. losing its will
and getting ready to pull out, as predicted. So what will we leave in
our wake.....another Viet Nam to collapse on itself.

I'm sure the next president will look forward to that mess.


If you can't come up with anything better you'd best be prepared to lose a lot of
nationwide elections in 2006 and 2008.


Couldn't get much worse actually. Just like the mess Johnson left for
Nixon.


George Bush is goiung to do just what Lyndon Johnson did in Viet Nam -
leave the cleanup and inevtiable messy exit to another president.
That's a fine legacy George!!


Rather than let him leave the cleanup to someone else would you support changing
things so that GWB could run again in 2008? That would give you at least one less
thing to whine about, wouldn't it?

dxAce
Michigan
USA




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grundig Yacht Boy (YB) Radios that are offered World Wide under the Grundig Yacht Boy (YB) Brand Name RHF Shortwave 5 February 5th 04 12:23 PM
Cherry Hill horse racetrack- Mad Cow Disease Link found Soames123 Shortwave 18 January 6th 04 01:14 AM
WOULD THE TERM "WORLD BAND" BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR SHORTWAVE? Andre Shortwave 5 November 30th 03 11:11 AM
Passport to World Band Radio 2004 Llgpt Shortwave 2 November 23rd 03 05:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017