JNS,

David wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:54:02 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


On Thu 01 Sep 2005 08:35:31p, David wrote in message
m:


On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:26:47 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:



It's not for protection of businesses at all, it's about curtailing
lawlessness for the greater good of all affected. The local authorities
either clamp down on it before it gets out of hand, or you will wind up
with N.O. as a general free-for-all zone with folks shooting at the
rescu... Whoops! Too late! The animals are running the zoo...

-=jd=-


Baghdad meets Venice. Lovely.


A culture steeped in liberal tolerance (once again) rolls right over the
cliff it had always been aiming for. How do you like the "if it feels good,
do it" ideology now?

-=jd=-

You are one ****ed-up puppy.



It would appear your logic and reason, like the looters in New
Orleans, have also been abandoned and left without hope. As evidenced by
your descendence from eloquence into hostile and bestial profanity.

I hope you're not armed, or your estate may have to repaint.

On 3 Sep 2005 12:39:17 -0700, "RHF"
wrote:

SNIP

SNIP
.
WHY THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS AND THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
ARE IN SUCH A MESS : {NEGLECT AND CORRUPTION}
* The City of New Orleans has been controlled by the
Democrat Party and it is a de-facto One-Party-Town with
all the Power and Corruption that comes from such a system
of One Party Rule.
* The greater problem is the State of Louisiana which has
been controlled by the Democrat Party and it is a de-facto
One-Party-State with all the Power and Corruption that comes
from such a system of One Party Rule.
* The Result is that of all the Major Cities in the South,
New Orleans has the reputation for being the most corrupt
and backward.
.
New Orleans : It ain't about Bush
- Its About the Money and the Blame !
.
.
so say i - my opinions stated as facts ~ RHF
. . . . .
The fact IS that Lousiana voted for Bush in the 2004 election!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_2004

Warren

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 14:36:29 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

I was able
to (apparently) completely flummox you

What a fruit bat.

I did a www.devilfinder.com for,Square Miles Area of England.The
Straightdope.com link says England is 50,400 square miles,Scotland is
30,400 sq miles,Wales is 8,000 sq miles,Northern Ireland is 5,500 sq
miles,Isle of Man is 225 sq miles,the Channel Islands about 75 sq miles
all together,but not officially part of the U.K.The White House
estimates an area of about 90,000 square miles (234,000 square
kilometers) has been affected by Hurricane Katrina.Prepared or
unprepared,it is a huge task getting help and aid to that large an area
especially after a tragedy such as Hurricane Katrina.
cuhulin

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:45:42 -0500, wrote:

I did a www.devilfinder.com for,Square Miles Area of England.The
Straightdope.com link says England is 50,400 square miles,Scotland is
30,400 sq miles,Wales is 8,000 sq miles,Northern Ireland is 5,500 sq
miles,Isle of Man is 225 sq miles,the Channel Islands about 75 sq miles
all together,but not officially part of the U.K.The White House
estimates an area of about 90,000 square miles (234,000 square
kilometers) has been affected by Hurricane Katrina.Prepared or
unprepared,it is a huge task getting help and aid to that large an area
especially after a tragedy such as Hurricane Katrina.
cuhulin

But you should take care of the place that is still having the weather
emergency (flood) first.