Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

an old friend wrote:

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:


an old friend wrote:


BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same
rights

so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights


OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I
ever denied you have the same rights?


by your remarks plain and simple


Ok, another chance, please quote any remarks I have made that would deny
you your rights.



your words
form craftmen and subcontractors quote

I think the word "intellectual" is streatching it quite a bit.

unquote

denieling that I have the same proerty rights as everyone else

That in no way denies you of any 'proerty' (whatever the hell that is)
or any other rights. Dumber than a bowl of dirt.

sure does as does your remark questioning my humanity
cut

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

The Terrorist Jihad dude did try to enter the
Stadium,Norman,Oklahoma,but he was refused because he wouldn't let
anybody inspect his backpack.He appeared to have a fresh beard,which is
a symbol of Terrorist Jihad.There were about 84,000 people in that
Stadium in Norman,Oklahoma.
cuhulin

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

www.homelandsecurityus.com U.S.federal government Ministry Of
Propaganda (so-called,national news media) is just NOT picking up on
that Terrorist Jihad story in Norman,Oklahoma.

I need to set my old Philco clock radio to woke me up at about 6:30 AM
this morning.One of those girls (y'all ought to see the bath room in her
house next door,we got it all torn out,she is going to redo the whole
shebang,, gawd,I love that gal) said she will help me pull my 1986 Ford
car out of that back yard over there on Jackson Highway in the morning
before she goes to work.(the Bell South woman) D..n car won't go in
reverse gear and there isn't enough room to turn my car around in that
back yard over there,it's only about an eight minute walk from my
house,according to my dog barking wris****ch.Why does everything have to
happen to me? I am really a nice old F..t
cuhulin

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

an old friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

an old friend wrote:

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:


an old friend wrote:


BTW hans here is another of the folks dening that I have the same
rights

so indeed most of the regulars are in agreement about equal rights


OK stupid, I'll give you a chance to prove that. Just where/when have I
ever denied you have the same rights?


by your remarks plain and simple


Ok, another chance, please quote any remarks I have made that would deny
you your rights.



your words
form craftmen and subcontractors quote

I think the word "intellectual" is streatching it quite a bit.

unquote

denieling that I have the same proerty rights as everyone else

That in no way denies you of any 'proerty' (whatever the hell that is)
or any other rights. Dumber than a bowl of dirt.



and why don't you even bother to remmebr your words for even a couple
of hours/

why are you so lazy?

Why are you so stupid?

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
cut
and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman) were slave holders at all

therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the
pural

God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from
all the Southern Colonies which later became states?

what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write
the thing
The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of
input from Adams and Franklin

the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved
by Tom, that is editing not writing

cut

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

Free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Those who believe in an
artificially enforced equality, therefore, hate the freedom which naturally
proves them to be silly and ignorant, brainwashed little sheep.
Ace - WH2T


"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"an_old_friend" wrote


You are one of those elist folks that can't accept that are ONLy equal
of the rest of us


The "equality of all" is a naive myth which serves mainly to perpetuate
mediocrity in the human race. "....that all men are created equal" makes a
nice sound-bite but even the most casual examination of any random sample
of humankind disproves it beyond any doubt.

It always baffles me that free people buy into the notion of "democratic
equality", because in fact the notions of "freedom" and "all are equal"
are almost diametrically opposed. If I accept that I am your equal (and
that you are mine) then I give up all freedom to be different from you,
better than you, or worse than you. I simply WILL NOT give up that
freedom, and therefore I reject the notion of "human equality".

If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt
Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at
http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html

73, de Hans, K0HB

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
cut
and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman) were slave holders at all

therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the
pural

God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from
all the Southern Colonies which later became states?

what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write
the thing

Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment
without the use of a quill pen, too.

The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of
input from Adams and Franklin

"Basically", you are an idiot who doesn't know what the hell you are
talking about. Oh, and his name was Thomas "Jefferson", stupid.

the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved
by Tom, that is editing not writing

You wouldn't know the difference anyways, stupid.

cut

Run away, Marky, run away.

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

Jeff (nospam) wrote:
"an old friend" wrote in message
ups.com...

Jeff (nospam) wrote:
"an old friend" wrote in message
ups.com...


not at all

but advocating violence against me or even against you "comander" is
violation of civl rights, and is in many places a criminal act
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh B.S. go back to law school. A person can advocate
whatever he wants, its what you "do" about it that counts. If advocating
violence against someone was a criminal act 40% of this country
would be locked up.

not at all

the legal system has so broken down that the law is hardly enforced
doesn't change the law
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Double BS,, cite me "one" case where someone "threatened'
to do something and got charged.

happens all the time mostly in mob cases

and there are people still in jail for merely threatening reagan as a
joke

people were arested for threatening Mrs Bush on the campiagn trail

The legal system hasnt gone to
hell,,,, there never has been a law against making threats.

guess you have never read the hate crimes laws in the nation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

yea I know all about hate "crimes". Please tell me how you
"prove" what someone is thinking and what they were going to do about it.

never said I was going to try

shows you are not reading the thread too

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

Dr.Ace wrote:
Free men are not equal, and equal men are not free. Those who believe in an
artificially enforced equality, therefore, hate the freedom which naturally
proves them to be silly and ignorant, brainwashed little sheep.
Ace - WH2T

bull**** is a complete response , and a proper label for that dreck


"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"an_old_friend" wrote


You are one of those elist folks that can't accept that are ONLy equal
of the rest of us


The "equality of all" is a naive myth which serves mainly to perpetuate
mediocrity in the human race. "....that all men are created equal" makes a
nice sound-bite but even the most casual examination of any random sample
of humankind disproves it beyond any doubt.

It always baffles me that free people buy into the notion of "democratic
equality", because in fact the notions of "freedom" and "all are equal"
are almost diametrically opposed. If I accept that I am your equal (and
that you are mine) then I give up all freedom to be different from you,
better than you, or worse than you. I simply WILL NOT give up that
freedom, and therefore I reject the notion of "human equality".

If you want to explore the results of real human equality, read Kurt
Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron" at
http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/hb.html

73, de Hans, K0HB

Great Liberty Net 3.931
 

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
cut
and none of the other persona mention ( Adams, Franklin, Livingston,
and Sherman) were slave holders at all

therefore again the document was not written by slaveholders in the
pural

God are you stupid, Marky. What about the authors of the document from
all the Southern Colonies which later became states?

what authors? the Congress adopted the declaration they did not write
the thing

Oh, stupid Marky? I suppose the ink just jumped onto the parchment
without the use of a quill pen, too.

no never said that idiot

The declaration was written basicaly by Tom Jerfferson with a bit of
input from Adams and Franklin

"Basically", you are an idiot who doesn't know what the hell you are
talking about. Oh, and his name was Thomas "Jefferson", stupid.

sure do knwo about it alot mor than you it would seem

not that knowing more than you about much of anything is much of an
acheievement

the Congress asked for and received a bunch of revisions all approved
by Tom, that is editing not writing

You wouldn't know the difference anyways, stupid.

I sure do as is obvious by the thread

cut

Run away, Marky, run away.