) writes:
m II wrote:
Perhaps he meant to say 'any sort of selectivity' ?

I re-read his posting, and I think he meant amplification. In context,
he was referring to the earliest vacuum tube days. The frequency
response of those tubes was limited. If I recall correctly, it was
limited by the physically large size and the spacing between the
filament, the grid, and the plate.


Howard Armstrong received the patent for the superhet, US patent number
1,342,885 in 1920. He wanted to receive what were astoundingly high
frequencies at the time, like in the 2 or 3MHz range.

At the time he cooked it up, even at the time the patent was issued,
there was no commercial radio broadcasting. The spectrum above
what is now the AM broadcast band was deemed useless (which is
why amateurs were relegated to "200 meters and down" after WWI.

I don't recall the schematic in Armstrong's patent, but if you look
in the history books, you find early schematics that use a chain
of RC coupled tubes for the IF strip, no selectivity.

Amplification has always lagged after frequency use. During WWII,
radar development was limited because they had problems getting
receiving tubes to work in the microwave frequencies, so they went
to diode mixers. It's pretty much always been easier to convert
to a lower frequency for amplification.

Michael