Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Black" wrote in message ... ) writes: m II wrote: Perhaps he meant to say 'any sort of selectivity' ? I re-read his posting, and I think he meant amplification. In context, he was referring to the earliest vacuum tube days. The frequency response of those tubes was limited. If I recall correctly, it was limited by the physically large size and the spacing between the filament, the grid, and the plate. Howard Armstrong received the patent for the superhet, US patent number 1,342,885 in 1920. He wanted to receive what were astoundingly high frequencies at the time, like in the 2 or 3MHz range. The story I remember is, during World War One, it was feared the Germans had developed a way to communicate at 100 meters. Armstrong wanted to intercept those communications, if they existed. At the time he cooked it up, even at the time the patent was issued, there was no commercial radio broadcasting. The spectrum above what is now the AM broadcast band was deemed useless (which is why amateurs were relegated to "200 meters and down" after WWI. I don't recall the schematic in Armstrong's patent, but if you look in the history books, you find early schematics that use a chain of RC coupled tubes for the IF strip, no selectivity. It's worth mentioning that there's a practical limit as to how much gain can be obtained at any one frequency, and that practical limit was much lower back in the earliest days. The superhet split it's gain at supersonic and sonic frequencies, and could have much more gain without breaking out into uncontrolled oscillation than a simple audio frequency amplifier. The tubes of that era were just about useless as amplifiers at 3 MHz. After Armstrong's invention, better triodes combined with better circuits such as the Neutrodyne, as well as the screen grid tubes, put the TRF back in the game into the early 30s, or so. Amplification has always lagged after frequency use. During WWII, radar development was limited because they had problems getting receiving tubes to work in the microwave frequencies, so they went to diode mixers. It's pretty much always been easier to convert to a lower frequency for amplification. Michael Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|