Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
When one examines our enemies in the War on Terror
– the Taliban, al Qaeda, the Ba’athists in Iraq, and for the more expansive among us, the regimes of Syria, Iran, and Stalinist North Korea – one finds only two things they all hold in common: hatred for America, and support from the Chinese Communist Party. http://www.dragoninthedark.com/ In 1999, a book by two Communist Chinese officers presented a scenario in which the World Trade Center is attacked as a situation that the United States would find difficult handle. The two colonels recommend Osama bin Laden by name as someone with the ability to orchestrate the attack of that magnitude via his al Qaeda group http://www.newsmax/archives/articles...4/143618.shtml Communist China signed a pact on economic cooperation with the Taliban on the morning of September 11, 2001, the very day the World Trade Center fell http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2001Sep14.html Communist China’s Xinhua press agency later produced a video on the 9/11/01 attacks “glorifying the strikes as a humbling blow against an arrogant nation” http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;$sessionid$431SABQAAB2BBQF IQMFCFGGAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2001/11/04/wchin04.xml&sSheet=/news/2001/11/04/i xhome.html After September 11, U.S. intelligence caught the Communist Chinese military’ s favorite technology firm – Huawei Technologies – building a telephone network in Kabul http://www.washtimes.com/national/20010928-343125.htm Raids of al Qaeda hideout by U.S. Special Forces and allies have netted, on more than one occasion, a large cache of weapons from Communist China, including surface-to-air missiles, http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...1007-5307r.htm mere weeks after the U.S. government warned that al Qaeda terrorists in the U.S. would try to use said missiles to take down American planes http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020601-74768506.htm http://asia.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/18/nr.00.html In the late summer of 2002, almost a year after Afghanistan was liberated, a three-man delegation from the Taliban, - led by Ustad Khalil, purported to be Mullah Omar’s right-hand man – spent a week in Communist China meeting with cadres, at their invitation. http://www.newsmax/showinside.shtml?a=2002/9/9/155340 In mid-2004, it was revealed that the Communist Chinese intelligence service had used some of its front companies in financial markets around the world to help al Qaeda raise and launder funds for their operations. http://www.geocities.com/china_e_lobby/05May2004.html In January 2001, Communist China was found to be selling Saddam Hussein missile technology http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...0112622320.htm In November of 2002, a Communist Chinese shipment of missile launching patrol boats to Iraq was intercepted by the U.S. Navy http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2002Dec11.html Much mo http://china-e-lobby.blogspot.com/20...t-iii-communis t_11.html Moving on, notice all these former CIA operatives coming out of the woodwork lately with allegations against Bush? Now read this: http://www.brookesnews.com/052609cia_print.html If we cut and run out of Iraq like we did in Vietnam the democratically "elected" government in Iraq will fall. The result? Absolute Turmoil! And I guarantee, that by Sept 11th, 2006, Communist China will sign an oil deal with the Taliban, al Qaeda or the Ba’athists in Baghdad. http://www.dragoninthedark.com/ Why? Read on... Last February, the Kremlin imposed a prohibition on any majority participation by foreign companies in the country's hydrocarbons. Two months later, Moscow inflicted a punishment on BP's Russian subsidiary that was more or less the same as the one employed against Yukos - the former oil giant that escaped Putin's control - by presenting a billion dollar bill for a suppositious fiscal infraction. The objective of the maneuver? To discourage BP from taking over any remains and to give them back to Gazprom, the huge State company that profited enormously from the Yukos implosion. Let's stick with Russia: The day after the bittersweet dialogue between Presidents Bush and Putin during the celebrations for the sixtieth anniversary of the fall of Berlin, the Russian autocrat made a discreet announcement. He is ready to negotiate with Beijing for the construction of an oil pipeline that would carry 30% of the energy resources which China imperatively needs to maintain its present rhythm of economic progress. One must remember that once the project is concluded, China will be more captive to Russian black gold than to that of any other producing country. If China is tributary to Russia first, then to Iran for all that concerns hydrocarbon supplies, that doesn't prevent it from all-out stimulation of energetic nationalism. Unlike other spheres of economic activity, the [Communist] State's presence in the oil business is dominant. There is no question of opening the door to private interests in this area. For example, Beijing fooled Exxon and Shell into believing that, if they got involved in the construction of an oil pipeline between the country's West and Shanghai, they would have access to the Chinese automobile market. To make a long story short, Beijing let things drag along until it had obtained the technology transfer it wanted. Once that was complete, the Chinese terminated any further work. When all these facts are taken into consideration, all given their proper weight, then - unless you are either totally credulous or fanatical - you will have to admit that the resources of a certain country take on a particular importance. What country might that be? Iraq. http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artm...w.cgi/37/11131 It's all very simple really. To which Dear Leader do you wish to be captive? Saddam? China's Hu Jintao? Russia's Putin? Who? Instead of pumping your gas from BP petrol stations, we could well be filling up at SINOpec. Continuing... China’s Hypocritical Energy Stance British Petroleum ( BP ) and its chairman Lord Browne attempted to take a significant financial interest in China’s largest oil refiner and fuel marketer, Sinopec. Under the conditions of the proposed deal, BP would have traded access to certain oil and gas fields in return for an equal or majority stake in Sinopec which is 80 percent owned by the Chinese government. Beijing would have become an equal or minority partner in a high-profile, state-run enterprise with national security significance; something the communist government was not prepared to do. “BP has misread what the Chinese want. They said no; they’ve said they’re not doing it,” one source close to the deal said. Does This Sound Familiar? Beijing’s move to protect one of its most treasured oil assets from foreign investors brings to mind comparisons of CNOOC’s failed bid to purchase U.S. oil company Unocal in June. In response to the failed Unocal bid, the Chinese foreign ministry released a statement in July saying, “We demand that the U.S. Congress correct its mistaken ways of politicizing economic and trade issues and stop interfering in the normal commercial exchanges between enterprises of the two countries.” Recent protectionist actions taken by Beijing involving BP and Sinopec make these statements all the more hypocritical. The Bush administration and members of the U.S. Congress took an unbelievable beating at home and abroad last summer for their stance regarding oil company Unocal. At that time, legitimate national security questions related to the deal were roundly criticized as protectionist attempts by U.S. hawks who feared China’s global rise and influence. Yet, China has essentially taken a similar protectionist stance with Sinopec, eliciting little debate in the international community. Why the lack of scrutiny? The reason is quite simple -- the world community has come to rely upon China’s unprecedented economic growth for its own economic vitality. As a result, countries that normally would object to such protectionist actions have remained eerily silent for fear of offending a rising China. This position of tacit appeasement, however, has created a dangerous precedent that if permitted to continue, will certainly challenge the basic principles of free enterprise. In essence, an acceptable double standard will be created exclusively for China. By looking the other way when Beijing violates the very same open market principles it publicly espouses to support, the global economic system is compromised. It is becoming clear that Beijing wants to maintain control over strategic assets in order to build global dominance in core industries such as energy, financial services, technology and manufacturing. Why? This will allow Beijing to influence the geo-political landscape for decades to come. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=20223 Now hold your breath, read this Holy Grail for the Left-wing piece from an ex-CIA operative, and prepare yourself to confront China over oil Globally. http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/printer_111805N.shtml Be careful what you wish for. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
Ahhhhh,lie detectors are phoney.Look at the pupils of peoples eyes if
you want to know if they are telling the truth or not,if they aren't telling the truth,the pupils of their eyes will get smaller.When I was in boot camp,an Officer picked out three or four of us guys for the reason he was testing out a lie detector.He couldn't get a good reading from my fingers because my fingers have thick tough skin on them.he then put some sort of a salve or what ever it was on my fingers so as to get a better reading on that lie detector.Of course I passed with flying colors.China has had guards in the Sudan for about six years or more protecting oil rigs over there. cuhulin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
In article ,
"SeeingEyeDog" wrote: When one examines our enemies in the War on Terror – the Taliban, al Qaeda, the Ba’athists in Iraq, wow. the taliban and al qaeda, who are the remnants of the mujahadeen we supportedin their fight against the spread of communism in the region are now commies? hahahaha!!!...and the baathists who spent their career torturing islamic radicals ( like us!) are now islamic terrorists...WOW!seeingeyedog...get that tinfoil hat out and specially quoting ( uncited) the ramblings of D.J. McGuire even sinks BEYOND crazy this is the same comic who said in the 80s the USSR would discard their Warsaw pact borders and overrun the NATO forces in a ten day Blitzkrieg...MAN IS HE INTUITIVE OR WHAT? AAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!!! interesting while you drone on about syria and iran and this vast commie conspiracy, you just as consistently conceal FACTS about alleged "allies" http://www.strategypage.com/dls/arti...0552912350.asp youre a sleazy weasel. you neocons swindlers are all figured out. go **** yourself. PLONK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
SeeingEyeDog wrote:
The reason is quite simple -- the world community has come to rely upon China’s unprecedented economic growth for its own economic vitality. Yeah, with us (as in the U.S.) being China's *biggest* trading partner, to say nothing of the Administration flacks that try to tell us "Outsourcing is great for the country and how dare we be against it" as our economy is hemorrhaging jobs. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
"George" propagadised wow. the taliban and al qaeda, who are the remnants of the mujahadeen we supportedin their fight against the spread of communism in the region are now commies? hahahaha!!!...and the baathists who spent their career torturing islamic radicals ( like us!) are now islamic terrorists...WOW!seeingeyedog...get that tinfoil hat out wow, and you are completely wrong in your knowledge of history in Afghanistan. Perhaps you should get your facts straight before you spout your idiodic propaganda. and specially quoting ( uncited) the ramblings of D.J. McGuire even sinks BEYOND crazy Cosidering your ability to know any history I would consider your accessment ludicrous. this is the same comic who said in the 80s the USSR would discard their Warsaw pact borders and overrun the NATO forces in a ten day Blitzkrieg...MAN IS HE INTUITIVE OR WHAT? AAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!!! interesting while you drone on about syria and iran and this vast commie conspiracy, you just as consistently conceal FACTS about alleged "allies" http://www.strategypage.com/dls/arti...0552912350.asp Just to remind you that your Socialist government in the EU is on the verge of lifting arm sales to Communist China. youre a sleazy weasel. you neocons swindlers are all figured out. go **** yourself. And you Dear Neo-Kommie are below sleaze, below swindler, below the ability to even **** yourself. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
"SeeingEyeDog" wrote in message ... When one examines our enemies in the War on Terror - the Taliban, al Qaeda, the Ba'athists in Iraq, and for the more expansive among us, the regimes of Syria, Iran, and Stalinist North Korea - one finds only two things they all hold in common: hatred for America, and support from the Chinese Communist Party. At the very same time we are fighting a so-called "War on Terror" about 65% of our consumer products are being MADE in China. This is VERY curious seeing that Al Quada and China are allegedly "drinking buddies" from a sociological standpoint! In fact, try this sometime. You would be hard pressed this xmas season to NOT find any kind of an xmas decoration that was NOT made in China. Take a trip to the local Dollar General or WalMart and tell me how many things you find that came from China on the shelves. Same goes for Home Depot, Radio Shack and Target. I must be the last guy on my block with glass xmas balls on his tree that were made in the USA. (..they are over 40+ years old) Want to know another one? It is also highly likely that the motherboard (main circuit board) inside of the computer you are using RIGHT NOW to process and read this message came from China. The color flat screen LCD you are reading this likely came from Korea or Japan, but you can be sure that the rest of the guts and the plastic case came from a factory in China. This is why I take everything I read about China with a grain of salt. There is no way these American companies will stop using offshore manufacturing from China. It costs more to ship the crap here than it does to make it. Enviornmental laws in China are also non-existent. They use chemicals there like DDT, TCE, Lead based pigments and colorants and others which stay over there, except for when the pollutant dusts from the THOUSANDS of factories gets into the upper winds and is carried over to the Western USA. Everything from Mercury Oxides to Lead Chromates to Vinyl Chloride and Bromides. The couldn't care less in China. They are making HARD CASH and that's the name of the game. They are also better than the Japanese when it comes to copying our technology and ideas. I can vividly recall at several GSA auctions seeing Chinese bidders buying up tons of retired electronics and manufacturing equipment from the US Govt. No doubt their highly trained scientists had the items copied inside of six months and are now selling the stuff back to us. I had to laugh when I read about how Lockheed Defense Systems Div. allegedly "misplaced" seveal thousand key files for the US Navy AEGIS Guided Missile System and how just a few years later almost perfect WORKING copies of the system started to appear on Chinese warships, which may be used against us later if we ever go to war over Taiwan. (..not that I could care less about Taiwan mind you, the only difference between Taiwan and China is about 40 Miles of water and the way they cook their noodles - their not worth it and they should be part of China as they do $40B in cross-border trade btwn them on a yearly basis already so their joined-at-the-hip economically already) So folks, readers, lurkers. Don't worry about China or alleged Al Queda linkages. China is going noplace. In fact in 5 Years just about everything you will buy will come from there or India who is the next big economic powerhouse. Learn how to profit from it instead of crying about it and you will make good. (why do your think that 8 or the 10 major importers and wholesale brokers of Chinese goods are run by jews.......get the picture?) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
jeb's 'dirty' secret exposed in riff. www.infowars.com And there
is jeb's Crooked Real Estate dealings in Miami (look it up) and jeb and g.w.bush picking up that bigggggg load of Cocaine at Tamiami Airport (there is a picture/photo of that somewhere on the internet and I understand the previous owner/Pilot of that Airplane was murdered,look it up) and jeb's daughter,noelle bush was Arrested at least twice on Drug Charges (look it up) and jeb's wife,columba bush tried to Smuggle in over $19,000 worth of clothing and jewelry items into America.(look it up) No Doubt there are Many other Scandals concerning jeb bush,,, and he and that AWOL MORON g.w.bush let Terri die.Yes,they are Responsible for Many Murders! cuhulin |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
SeeingEyeDog - Kindly put an (OT) :
at the start of the Subject Line ~ RHF |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Be Very Carefull For What You Wish
"Kenny McCormick" wrote in message roups.com... In fact, try this sometime. You would be hard pressed this xmas season to NOT find any kind of an xmas decoration that was NOT made in China. I need go no further than our local US Army PX. Very little in there that's made in the US. In the electronics section, everything is made in China, Korea, or Japan, in that order. The toy section.. all China. Clothing section.. China, India, Pakistan. Glassware.. China, Korea, Philippines, and some US stuff like Pyrex. Electrical and automotive, mostly China, except the oil products, and very few tools (even the Craftsman stuff is made in China). Very little of consequence is made in the US anymore. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|