Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Nov 2005 04:55:58 -0800, "John S." wrote:
OregonMike wrote: I'm planning to buy a new rcvr and would love some input on the current scene. Things that pop into my mind that are a must are (1) SSB/CW reception (2) Freq. read out (LCD or whatever) (3) External antenna support (4) High sensitiviy and selectivity I haven't looked at SWL RCVRs in some time and don't really know much of what's best to get with the ones I'm seeing available to buy online. I'm not even keen on where the best place to buy on is. Any help or input would be great! Thanks, OM In addition to the several new radios mentioned you should give consideration to buying a used receiver such as a Kenwood R-5000, Icom R71a or one of the Japan Radios. The Kenwood R-5000 is my personal favorite, but any of the three will provide excellent reception and have several features that wil help extracting a signal from difficult listening conditions. Good luck in the search and be sure to mention the receiver you finally choose. Thanks for the reply.. I would guess that an r-5000 may be tough to lug around easily like to the office, living room, patio, and wherenot ... OM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() OregonMike wrote: On 27 Nov 2005 04:55:58 -0800, "John S." wrote: OregonMike wrote: I'm planning to buy a new rcvr and would love some input on the current scene. Things that pop into my mind that are a must are (1) SSB/CW reception (2) Freq. read out (LCD or whatever) (3) External antenna support (4) High sensitiviy and selectivity I haven't looked at SWL RCVRs in some time and don't really know much of what's best to get with the ones I'm seeing available to buy online. I'm not even keen on where the best place to buy on is. Any help or input would be great! Thanks, OM In addition to the several new radios mentioned you should give consideration to buying a used receiver such as a Kenwood R-5000, Icom R71a or one of the Japan Radios. The Kenwood R-5000 is my personal favorite, but any of the three will provide excellent reception and have several features that wil help extracting a signal from difficult listening conditions. Good luck in the search and be sure to mention the receiver you finally choose. Thanks for the reply.. I would guess that an r-5000 may be tough to lug around easily like to the office, living room, patio, and wherenot ... OM Wasn't aware of the portability issue. That said, the R-5000 runs easily on 12 volts and a simple wire or an amplified whip antenna will provide lots of signal. To be honest, I would stay away from the high-priced receivers from Eton/Grundig. Products from that company seem to have more than their share of quality control problems so if you go with something from them minimize your risk of loss by buying on the lower end. Or, look at a Sony 7600 which is very portable, does ssb and voice very well. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John S. wrote: To be honest, I would stay away from the high-priced receivers from Eton/Grundig. Products from that company seem to have more than their share of quality control problems so if you go with something from them minimize your risk of loss by buying on the lower end. Very much an issue with the Satellit 800, which was put together by the Tecsun folks in China; but I hadn't heard of quality control issues with the E1, which is put together by your friends at Bharat Electronics, an Indian manufacturer of defense and civil communications products. The E1 has been out on the market for a number of months now... have there been quality control issues to emerge? This was one reason why I have opted to wait it out a bit before purchasing an E1: to see if a shakedown was in order. Kept my fingers crossed that this wouldn't be another Satellit 800, in that regard. But from all indicators I've seen thus far, the E1 seems consistently solid in build quality (thankfully). |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() junius wrote: John S. wrote: To be honest, I would stay away from the high-priced receivers from Eton/Grundig. Products from that company seem to have more than their share of quality control problems so if you go with something from them minimize your risk of loss by buying on the lower end. Very much an issue with the Satellit 800, which was put together by the Tecsun folks in China; but I hadn't heard of quality control issues with the E1, which is put together by your friends at Bharat Electronics, an Indian manufacturer of defense and civil communications products. The E1 has been out on the market for a number of months now... have there been quality control issues to emerge? This was one reason why I have opted to wait it out a bit before purchasing an E1: to see if a shakedown was in order. Kept my fingers crossed that this wouldn't be another Satellit 800, in that regard. But from all indicators I've seen thus far, the E1 seems consistently solid in build quality (thankfully). The geographic location of the manufacturing facility is not the issue. The willingness of a marketing and distribution operation like Eton/Grundig to pay for and insist on strict quality control and good quality components is really the issue. Their track record of haphazard delivery schedules and poor quality in prior products does not give me much assurance with this latest round of receivers. Maybe things have changed, but I would not gamble that much money at this point. The Tecsun-Degen group are capable of producing good quality radios, but quality costs money that Eton apparently was not willing to invest in the 800 project. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John S. wrote: The geographic location of the manufacturing facility is not the issue. Indeed, geography as such isn't an issue. The fact that the product is being put together by a manufacturer other than Tecsun-Degen could well be. The willingness of a marketing and distribution operation like Eton/Grundig to pay for and insist on strict quality control and good quality components is really the issue. Shifting operations to Bharat Electronics Ltd could well be a part of an Eton/Grundig insistence on a higher level of quality control where this model is concerned. Their track record of haphazard delivery schedules and poor quality in prior products does not give me much assurance with this latest round of receivers. Thus far, their track record with quality control in this unit seems to be a break from the ineptitude with the Satellite 800. Admitedly, the delays on the release of the E1, on the other hand, were annoying and certainly gave reason for pause. Maybe things have changed, but I would not gamble that much money at this point. Admittedly, the degree of risk aversion varies from consumer to consumer, so I can understand if someone in the market for a premium portable decided to wait it out a bit longer on this one. I've done so myself, despite the fact that I was quite impressed by the sample I borrowed from a friend. The Tecsun-Degen group are capable of producing good quality radios, but quality costs money that Eton apparently was not willing to invest in the 800 project. Maybe the Tecsun-Degen group are capable of putting together a decent under $100 throwaway...I don't really know. Given their track record in partnership with Eton/Grundig, I'd be extremely cautious with regard to any premium set that they might put out. Junius |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() junius wrote: John S. wrote: The geographic location of the manufacturing facility is not the issue. Indeed, geography as such isn't an issue. The fact that the product is being put together by a manufacturer other than Tecsun-Degen could well be. The willingness of a marketing and distribution operation like Eton/Grundig to pay for and insist on strict quality control and good quality components is really the issue. Shifting operations to Bharat Electronics Ltd could well be a part of an Eton/Grundig insistence on a higher level of quality control where this model is concerned. Their track record of haphazard delivery schedules and poor quality in prior products does not give me much assurance with this latest round of receivers. Thus far, their track record with quality control in this unit seems to be a break from the ineptitude with the Satellite 800. Admitedly, the delays on the release of the E1, on the other hand, were annoying and certainly gave reason for pause. Maybe things have changed, but I would not gamble that much money at this point. Admittedly, the degree of risk aversion varies from consumer to consumer, so I can understand if someone in the market for a premium portable decided to wait it out a bit longer on this one. I've done so myself, despite the fact that I was quite impressed by the sample I borrowed from a friend. The Tecsun-Degen group are capable of producing good quality radios, but quality costs money that Eton apparently was not willing to invest in the 800 project. Maybe the Tecsun-Degen group are capable of putting together a decent under $100 throwaway...I don't really know. Given their track record in partnership with Eton/Grundig, I'd be extremely cautious with regard to any premium set that they might put out. I've got a $60.00 Degen DE1103 that has had no QC problems - it works every time. Indeed it is finshed well and the parts fit tightly. At half the price of a Sony it is a steal. The memory system has some limitations inherent with the design, but it works. OTOH I have an Eton hand crank generator radio that feels downright flimsy considering it sells for $40.00 Whether it is of Chinese or Indian origin isn't as important as the wobbly grindy crank generator which feels like it could come apart at the wrong time. Junius |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Kenwood R-2000 rcvr with upgrades | Swap | |||
FS: Icom R-70 Rcvr | Swap | |||
FS: Icom IC-R70 Rcvr | Swap | |||
FS: Sierra 121 Tunable VTVM/VLF Rcvr | Equipment | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |