Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For DRM experimenters, the DW transmission using DRM on 3995 kHz is
coming in fabulously here in Detroit at 0300 UTC on 27-Dec-2005 with no dropouts and excellent fidelity. It's too bad that their DRM transmissions wreak such havoc with the hams trying to operate in the 80 meter ham band! Fred E. -- N8UC Detroit, MI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Byung Myung Sying wrote: For DRM experimenters, the DW transmission using DRM on 3995 kHz is coming in fabulously here in Detroit at 0300 UTC on 27-Dec-2005 with no dropouts and excellent fidelity. It's too bad that their DRM transmissions wreak such havoc with the hams trying to operate in the 80 meter ham band! DRM = QRM dxAce Michigan USA |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ate in the 80 meter ham band!
Your idiotic third grade "sloganeering" isn't going to make DRM go away. Responding to every DRM post with "DRM = QRM" just makes you appear annoying and foolish, it doesn't add anything to the discussion. Grow up. Shortwave DX'ers have always had to struggle agains QRN from the USSR's "woodpecker", the RTTY news services etc. DRM is no better and no worse than any of these noises. The technology is very interesting and it does provide superb fidelity over shortwave in a very technologically cool way. Whether it will ever become viable is open to question due to the unpredictablility of shortwave propagation and the enormous real estate needed for shortwave transmitters. DRM = QRM dxAce Michigan USA |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Byung Myung Sying wrote: ate in the 80 meter ham band! Your idiotic third grade "sloganeering" isn't going to make DRM go away. Responding to every DRM post with "DRM = QRM" just makes you appear annoying and foolish, it doesn't add anything to the discussion. Grow up. Stuff a sock in it, Einstein. DRM = QRM Sorry if the truth hurts, 'tard boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dxAce wrote:
DRM = QRM No, bad operating practice is QRM, If DW broadcasts DRM on a frequency that is legal for them to broadcast on, then hams trying to operate over it are at fault. The 80m ham band ends at 3850kHz in most of the world. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 The trouble with being a futurist is that when people get around to believing you, it's too late. We lost. Google 2,000,000:Hams 0. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote: dxAce wrote: DRM = QRM No, bad operating practice is QRM, If DW broadcasts DRM on a frequency that is legal for them to broadcast on, then hams trying to operate over it are at fault. The 80m ham band ends at 3850kHz in most of the world. But not here and their signal propagates VERY well here. I'd almost say that they are in violation of the rules in that regard. At any rate, a stupid method of transmission that renders 10 kHz unusable is not a very good idea! dxAce Michigan USA |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Byung Myung Sying" wrote in message ... For DRM experimenters, the DW transmission using DRM on 3995 kHz is coming in fabulously here in Detroit at 0300 UTC on 27-Dec-2005 with no dropouts and excellent fidelity. Is DW broadcasting in any of the languages which are likely to be understood in the area? If so, is the programming worth listening to? It's too bad that their DRM transmissions wreak such havoc with the hams trying to operate in the 80 meter ham band! I know this is a rethorical question but -- what's with those DRM guys? Why don't they put their noisemakers on some rarely used parts of the SW spectrum? Frank Dresser |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Byung Myung Sying wrote:
For DRM experimenters, the DW transmission using DRM on 3995 kHz is coming in fabulously here in Detroit at 0300 UTC on 27-Dec-2005 with no dropouts and excellent fidelity. It's too bad that their DRM transmissions wreak such havoc with the hams trying to operate in the 80 meter ham band! It's only the 80m ham band in the "Americas". In Deutchland it's a shortwave broadcast band. Technicly hams that try to operate on that frequency are at fault, not DW. DW is operating legaly, and therefore they are obligated to keep off the frequency. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 The trouble with being a futurist is that when people get around to believing you, it's too late. We lost. Google 2,000,000:Hams 0. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Deutsche Welle Time and Frequency Changes | Shortwave | |||
Deutsche Welle Relay Station At Trincomalee, Sri Lanka, Unharmed | Shortwave | |||
Deutsche Welle - budget cuts looming | Shortwave | |||
Deutsche Welle - B'04 | Shortwave | |||
Deutsche Welle | Shortwave |