| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
I actually have IBOC capability on my home receiver (the Yamaha
RX-V4600). The "mutlicasting" on FM is actually pretty nice since it allows commercially-untenable formats to be broadcast. Here in Detroit, we have 9 stations broadcasting "second IBOC" channels. One (94.7) uses its second IBOC channel to broadcast "deep album rock" from the 1960's and 70's. Another (105.1) broadcasts classical "pops" on its second IBOC channel. Another broadcasts "live rock concerts" on it's second IBOC channel. The audio quality on the FM IBOC channels is about as good as a 256K MP3. An analogue FM transmission is capable of MUCH better sound quality (although only a few stations such as WFMT in Chicago or WQXR in New York actually broadcast uncompressed FM analogue sound). The big problem, reception-quality-wise, is that FM IBOC is unreceivable unless you are in a strong, local reception condition. For example, there's an NPR station that broadcasts classical music in Lansing, MI (about 80 miles from me) and I can't pick up their IBOC signal, even with a yagi directional FM antenna. Their analogue signal comes in just fine, and my receiver reverts to analogue since the digital IBOC signal is unreceivable. As far as AM IBOC goes, Detroit's 950 AM and 910 AM broadcast an IBOC signal. 950's audio quality was HORRIBLE when it first started up, with echoey, swishy, digital artifact sound. Now, Ibiquity seems to have fixed something and 950's signal sounds okay with nice high frequency reproduction. It sounds about as good as a 64K MP3. 910's IBOC signal still sounds awful (although it's in stereo). AM IBOC though does NOT in any way, shape, or form have "FM quality sound" as Ibiquity's advertising trumpets. There is an AM stereo station locally (CFCO in Chatham, ON) which indeed DOES have "audio quality approaching FM" when listened to on a good AM stereo receiver (I have an AM stereo tuner in my Ford Escape Hybrid which has the best sound that I've ever heard out of an AM radio). As far as "IBOC vs DRM" for "high fidelity AM" broadcasts, since IBOC "shares" the allotted bandwidth with an analogue signal, it requires an extremely strong local signal in order to receive it. There is an AM NPR station in Lansing, MI which is UNRECEIVABLE in IBOC mode from 70 miles away, even using a Kiwa Air Core Loop which brings in the analogue AM signal 20 dB over S9. In contrast, since DRM does not share it's bandwidth with an analogue signal, the ability to "DX DRM" is much greater. I can receive DRM test transmissions with perfect decoding from stations that are inaudible in analogue mode (Deutsche Welle and Radio Nederland quite often "switch over" from analogue to DRM in the midst of a broadcast). As far as "Eureka DAB" goes, it's deader than a doornail in Canada. The foppish bureaucrats who were trying to "act European and declare their independence from the U.S." by implementing DAB in Canada failed miserably and wasted millions of Canadian tax dollars in the process. Since most Canadian stations (except the CBC) are dependent on U.S. advertising, absolutely NONE of them were about to replace AM and FM with DAB and lose all of the U.S. advertising dollars. I spoke with an engineer at the local CBC station in Windsor, ON and he didn't even KNOW that there was still a DAB transmitter operating in Windsor. The Canadians quietly abandoned their ill-conceived DAB pork-barrel and have allowed XM and Sirius to begin service in Canada. The above comments are based on empiricle results from my own listening and DX'ing experiences using analogue AM Stereo, IBOC, and DRM receivers. Fred E. - N8UC Detroit, MI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| IBOC forces KSL-AM to drop decades-old tradition. | Broadcasting | |||
| Here is "Why" I am 'skeptical' about DRM and IBOC | Shortwave | |||
| IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
| The AM IBOC mess is yet to begin... | Broadcasting | |||