![]() |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Bottom line, if you want the priveleges, you takes the test (and that pretty much holds true for anything), you don't get to 'cherry-pick' the particular things that you feel comfortable with being tested on, or that which YOU feel YOU have a use for. You're sounding more and more Liberal with each post! And you're sounding like the typical code zealot. You'd make the perfect elitest liberal. Are you currently licensed? Nope. I'm waiting to see how the current license thing shakes out. Been meaning to for awhile now. I listen in on some 2m nets and stuff via the scanners and am starting to get the bug to talk insted of listen. From what I've seen the current ham tests are just like what Microsoft had for NT certification. Petty easy to pass with some memorization. But MSFT got wise and made the tests harder with each OS release. It would be fairly easy to make the tech test harder by not publishing the answers. You'd get a better quality of hams then instead of people with good memory who can barely do code. That would certainly be true, however, it seems as though you do want a license but are unwilling to learn the code. So, I guess you'll have to sit on the sidelines waiting to see how things shake out. But, you can obtain a license now and talk till your lungs collapse, you just can't get on HF without doing that nasty code thing. I hereby rest my case. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Bottom line, if you want the priveleges, you takes the test (and that pretty much holds true for anything), you don't get to 'cherry-pick' the particular things that you feel comfortable with being tested on, or that which YOU feel YOU have a use for. You're sounding more and more Liberal with each post! And you're sounding like the typical code zealot. You'd make the perfect elitest liberal. Well, I guess I am an 'elitist'. I was able to pass the 13 WPM requirement to obtain a General class license. I didn't allow the code requirement to hold me back whether I was going to ever use it or not. I wasn't lazy, I wasn't dumb, I simply wanted the ticket, and I didn't whine about it. Now, I guess I could use your mentality (and that of others) to provide a 'mental block' to my obtaining a Extra Class ticket if I desired to get one. I could whine, complain, stamp my feet and say that there are questions on the Extra exam that pertain to things that I just don't personally plan on using in Amateur Radio. But would I allow those things to get in my way? No, I'd simply buckle down, study, and take the test. I'm not a whiny Liberal. dxAce Michigan USA Well, your constant whining that removing code will "dumb down" ham radio dosent really hold water. That's simply your Liberal opinion. But as a recently outed Liberal you've completely missed the point. Why am I not surprised? LMFAO at yet another one. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Bottom line, if you want the priveleges, you takes the test (and that pretty much holds true for anything), you don't get to 'cherry-pick' the particular things that you feel comfortable with being tested on, or that which YOU feel YOU have a use for. You're sounding more and more Liberal with each post! And you're sounding like the typical code zealot. You'd make the perfect elitest liberal. Well, I guess I am an 'elitist'. I was able to pass the 13 WPM requirement to obtain a General class license. I didn't allow the code requirement to hold me back whether I was going to ever use it or not. I wasn't lazy, I wasn't dumb, I simply wanted the ticket, and I didn't whine about it. Now, I guess I could use your mentality (and that of others) to provide a 'mental block' to my obtaining a Extra Class ticket if I desired to get one. I could whine, complain, stamp my feet and say that there are questions on the Extra exam that pertain to things that I just don't personally plan on using in Amateur Radio. But would I allow those things to get in my way? No, I'd simply buckle down, study, and take the test. I'm not a whiny Liberal. dxAce Michigan USA Well, your constant whining that removing code will "dumb down" ham radio dosent really hold water. That's simply your Liberal opinion. But as a recently outed Liberal you've completely missed the point. Why am I not surprised? LMFAO at yet another one. Right over your head eh Steve. |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Bottom line, if you want the priveleges, you takes the test (and that pretty much holds true for anything), you don't get to 'cherry-pick' the particular things that you feel comfortable with being tested on, or that which YOU feel YOU have a use for. You're sounding more and more Liberal with each post! And you're sounding like the typical code zealot. You'd make the perfect elitest liberal. Are you currently licensed? Nope. I'm waiting to see how the current license thing shakes out. Been meaning to for awhile now. I listen in on some 2m nets and stuff via the scanners and am starting to get the bug to talk insted of listen. From what I've seen the current ham tests are just like what Microsoft had for NT certification. Petty easy to pass with some memorization. But MSFT got wise and made the tests harder with each OS release. It would be fairly easy to make the tech test harder by not publishing the answers. You'd get a better quality of hams then instead of people with good memory who can barely do code. That would certainly be true, however, it seems as though you do want a license but are unwilling to learn the code. So, I guess you'll have to sit on the sidelines waiting to see how things shake out. No, I could go take the tech test tomorrow and probably pass. I waiting to see if they change the test......again. |
New Technician License
an_old_friend wrote: dxAce wrote: MnMikew wrote: cut How about the last time you used CW? Maybe 10 years ago. I certainly haven't forgotten it though. Pretty confident I could get the key back out and do all right. in other words do as Isay not as I do the word is hypocrite How do you figure that, 'tard boy? No one has ever said that using CW is a total time requirement. It's just like any number of other questions that have been on the test either now or in the past. It's just a 'question' on the test. Just pass the test and if you desire you need never use CW again. But, you can always renew your license. One doesn't get to 'cherry-pick' the questions one wants on the exam. I realize though that that concept is pretty much beyond you. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"Carter, K8VT" wrote: MnMikew wrote: So why is it you mostly listen Steve? When was your last contact? Do you even own a ham rig? Interesting questions...but more to the point, one is compelled to ask "Mr. CW" (the self-appointed "ace" and defender of the CW flame) what his *current* CW speed is and how much CW he actually operates. I figure I could send 18-20. Receiving itself may be a bit rusty, say 10 or so? The real key would be how long it might take me to get up to speed again. One thing though, you don't have to appoint yourself 'tard boy', as I've done it for you! Is he a VE? Is that a license requirement, 'tard boy? Has he mentored any potential new hams-- Is that a license requirement, 'tard boy? or just given them a heaping ration of his usual ridicule? Truth be told, with all his whining about excuses, it all seems to ultimately boil down to *him* using the oldest excuse in the book; i.e. "Well, I had to learn CW, so you should too". Please try to pay attention, Grabowski. I realize that may be a bit tough for you, being a flaming Liberal and all, but give it a try. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... So why is it you mostly listen Steve? It's my preferred hobby, and I personally find SWBC DX'ing more challenging than Amateur radio DX'ing. Why? Because. Wouldnt actually contacting someone be more rewarding? No, at least not to me anyway. Been there, done that. When was your last contact? Yesterday, on 2 meters. When's the last time you were on HF? Gee, maybe 10 years ago? How about the last time you used CW? Maybe 10 years ago. I certainly haven't forgotten it though. Pretty confident I could get the key back out and do all right. You listen at all to HF hams via shortwave anymore? I can get some to come in here but my backyard antenna is in need of a serious upgrade. |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... No one has ever said that using CW is a total time requirement. It's just like any number of other questions that have been on the test either now or in the past. It's just a 'question' on the test. Just pass the test and if you desire you need never use CW again. But, you can always renew your license. So why not replace the worthless code questions with more pertinent questions? |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... So why is it you mostly listen Steve? It's my preferred hobby, and I personally find SWBC DX'ing more challenging than Amateur radio DX'ing. Why? Because. Wouldnt actually contacting someone be more rewarding? No, at least not to me anyway. Been there, done that. When was your last contact? Yesterday, on 2 meters. When's the last time you were on HF? Gee, maybe 10 years ago? How about the last time you used CW? Maybe 10 years ago. I certainly haven't forgotten it though. Pretty confident I could get the key back out and do all right. You listen at all to HF hams via shortwave anymore? Yes, most every morning. I can get some to come in here but my backyard antenna is in need of a serious upgrade. The bands are full of them, upgrade that antenna. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
dxAce wrote: an_old_friend wrote: dxAce wrote: MnMikew wrote: cut How about the last time you used CW? Maybe 10 years ago. I certainly haven't forgotten it though. Pretty confident I could get the key back out and do all right. in other words do as Isay not as I do the word is hypocrite How do you figure that, 'tard boy? very easily No one has ever said that using CW is a total time requirement. that is a lie many people have wether you are amoug them is another matter It's just like any number of other questions that have been on the test either now or in the past. what other single question cases one to fail if you miss it? It's just a 'question' on the test. what other single question cases one to fail if you miss it? Just pass the test and if you desire you need never use CW again. But, you can always renew your license. so what was the point of the requirement today? hazinf ritual I guess you never out grew that frat boy stuff One doesn't get to 'cherry-pick' the questions one wants on the exam. but one can use the means provided to seeek to change the rules as I have and have (with other very nearly suceeded I realize though that that concept is pretty much beyond you. the concept of change seems beyond you dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... No one has ever said that using CW is a total time requirement. It's just like any number of other questions that have been on the test either now or in the past. It's just a 'question' on the test. Just pass the test and if you desire you need never use CW again. But, you can always renew your license. So why not replace the worthless code questions with more pertinent questions? LMFAO... here we go again! It's YOU who feels that it's worthless. Damn, you Liberals never quit with the crap. Bye, boy. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
dxAce wrote: "Carter, K8VT" wrote: MnMikew wrote: So why is it you mostly listen Steve? When was your last contact? Do you even own a ham rig? Interesting questions...but more to the point, one is compelled to ask "Mr. CW" (the self-appointed "ace" and defender of the CW flame) what his *current* CW speed is and how much CW he actually operates. I figure I could send 18-20. Receiving itself may be a bit rusty, say 10 or so? The real key would be how long it might take me to get up to speed again. One thing though, you don't have to appoint yourself 'tard boy', as I've done it for you! Is he a VE? Is that a license requirement, 'tard boy? Has he mentored any potential new hams-- Is that a license requirement, 'tard boy? or just given them a heaping ration of his usual ridicule? Truth be told, with all his whining about excuses, it all seems to ultimately boil down to *him* using the oldest excuse in the book; i.e. "Well, I had to learn CW, so you should too". Please try to pay attention, Grabowski. I realize that may be a bit tough for you, being a flaming Liberal and all, but give it a try. we are certainly hearing you I suspect however we are not getting the message you desire what we are hearing that all you want to do is whine are you one the fellow still whinging about incentive licensing we still have one of those fellows oer in RRAP dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
dxAce wrote: MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... No one has ever said that using CW is a total time requirement. It's just like any number of other questions that have been on the test either now or in the past. It's just a 'question' on the test. Just pass the test and if you desire you need never use CW again. But, you can always renew your license. So why not replace the worthless code questions with more pertinent questions? LMFAO... here we go again! It's YOU who feels that it's worthless. so do you it seems by your level of interest in USING it Damn, you Liberals never quit with the crap. Bye, boy. promises promises dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
an old friend wrote: dxAce wrote: an_old_friend wrote: dxAce wrote: MnMikew wrote: cut How about the last time you used CW? Maybe 10 years ago. I certainly haven't forgotten it though. Pretty confident I could get the key back out and do all right. in other words do as Isay not as I do the word is hypocrite How do you figure that, 'tard boy? very easily No one has ever said that using CW is a total time requirement. that is a lie many people have wether you are amoug them is another matter It's just like any number of other questions that have been on the test either now or in the past. what other single question cases one to fail if you miss it? It's just a 'question' on the test. what other single question cases one to fail if you miss it? Just pass the test and if you desire you need never use CW again. But, you can always renew your license. so what was the point of the requirement today? T get you to actually LEARN something? hazinf ritual I guess you never out grew that frat boy stuff One doesn't get to 'cherry-pick' the questions one wants on the exam. but one can use the means provided to seeek to change the rules as I have and have (with other very nearly suceeded I realize though that that concept is pretty much beyond you. the concept of change seems beyond you The concept of proper spelling seems to be way beyond you, (as does any test taking ability), and that probably has an effect on your code reading ability. LMFAO at the clueless 'tard. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... No one has ever said that using CW is a total time requirement. It's just like any number of other questions that have been on the test either now or in the past. It's just a 'question' on the test. Just pass the test and if you desire you need never use CW again. But, you can always renew your license. So why not replace the worthless code questions with more pertinent questions? LMFAO... here we go again! It's YOU who feels that it's worthless. Damn, you Liberals never quit with the crap. Ol Carter pretty much pegged you to a tee. |
New Technician License
an old friend wrote: dxAce wrote: "Carter, K8VT" wrote: MnMikew wrote: So why is it you mostly listen Steve? When was your last contact? Do you even own a ham rig? Interesting questions...but more to the point, one is compelled to ask "Mr. CW" (the self-appointed "ace" and defender of the CW flame) what his *current* CW speed is and how much CW he actually operates. I figure I could send 18-20. Receiving itself may be a bit rusty, say 10 or so? The real key would be how long it might take me to get up to speed again. One thing though, you don't have to appoint yourself 'tard boy', as I've done it for you! Is he a VE? Is that a license requirement, 'tard boy? Has he mentored any potential new hams-- Is that a license requirement, 'tard boy? or just given them a heaping ration of his usual ridicule? Truth be told, with all his whining about excuses, it all seems to ultimately boil down to *him* using the oldest excuse in the book; i.e. "Well, I had to learn CW, so you should too". Please try to pay attention, Grabowski. I realize that may be a bit tough for you, being a flaming Liberal and all, but give it a try. we are certainly hearing you I suspect however we are not getting the message you desire what we are hearing that all you want to do is whine Me? Whine? If you think I'm whining then you've clearly missed the point, 'tard boy. It's those who are to lazy to learn a measly 5 WPM who are doing the whining. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... LMFAO... here we go again! It's YOU who feels that it's worthless. so do you it seems by your level of interest in USING it He dosent use it, not in at least 10 years. |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... The bands are full of them, upgrade that antenna. Soon as the snow melts. Got a new 100" longwire and a G5Rv to try. |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... LMFAO... here we go again! It's YOU who feels that it's worthless. so do you it seems by your level of interest in USING it He dosent use it, not in at least 10 years. So? Still got the ticket! Try to pay even the slightest bit of attention to what I've stated previously, 'tard boy! LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... No one has ever said that using CW is a total time requirement. It's just like any number of other questions that have been on the test either now or in the past. It's just a 'question' on the test. Just pass the test and if you desire you need never use CW again. But, you can always renew your license. So why not replace the worthless code questions with more pertinent questions? LMFAO... here we go again! It's YOU who feels that it's worthless. Damn, you Liberals never quit with the crap. Ol Carter pretty much pegged you to a tee. Really? I'm not the one who is incapable of passing a CW test (and neither is he, for that matter), it be YOU who seems to be incapable and continues to come up with excuses as to why YOU shouldn't have to pass that test. In fact, you've even shown that you can come up with a handy excuse for not even taking the Tech exam. (Question pool). LMFAO at the newly born Liberal. You and (Ol) Carter should really get along! Thanks for providing me with a fun filled, humorous afternoon. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Me? Whine? If you think I'm whining then you've clearly missed the point, 'tard boy. It's those who are to lazy to learn a measly 5 WPM who are doing the whining. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! LMFAO It's those that shun progress that whine the most. |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... LMFAO... here we go again! It's YOU who feels that it's worthless. so do you it seems by your level of interest in USING it He dosent use it, not in at least 10 years. So? Still got the ticket! Try to pay even the slightest bit of attention to what I've stated previously, 'tard boy! So you have a ticket you never use, good for you and thanks for proving my point. |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Me? Whine? If you think I'm whining then you've clearly missed the point, 'tard boy. It's those who are to lazy to learn a measly 5 WPM who are doing the whining. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! LMFAO It's those that shun progress that whine the most. How does dropping a code test equate to 'progress'? I might buy the fact that without it, you might 'progress' to HF privileges, but beyond that, it'll take a heap of convincing. Stop making Liberal excuses and just learn it and get on with life rather than trying to make life fit your particular vision of reality. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Ol Carter pretty much pegged you to a tee. Really? I'm not the one who is incapable of passing a CW test (and neither is he, for that matter), it be YOU who seems to be incapable and continues to come up with excuses as to why YOU shouldn't have to pass that test. In fact, you've even shown that you can come up with a handy excuse for not even taking the Tech exam. (Question pool). LMFAO at the newly born Liberal. You and (Ol) Carter should really get along! So if one disagrees with the great dxace their a liberal? Such logic. Explains a lot, thanks. |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... LMFAO... here we go again! It's YOU who feels that it's worthless. so do you it seems by your level of interest in USING it He dosent use it, not in at least 10 years. So? Still got the ticket! Try to pay even the slightest bit of attention to what I've stated previously, 'tard boy! So you have a ticket you never use, good for you and thanks for proving my point. Just what point was that? I can use it any time I so desire (and did so yesterday, 'tard boy. Please try to pay attention.), YOU, on the other hand, do not have that option. LMFAO at the newly minted Liberal. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Me? Whine? If you think I'm whining then you've clearly missed the point, 'tard boy. It's those who are to lazy to learn a measly 5 WPM who are doing the whining. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! LMFAO It's those that shun progress that whine the most. How does dropping a code test equate to 'progress'? I might buy the fact that without it, you might 'progress' to HF privileges, but beyond that, it'll take a heap of convincing. Stop making Liberal excuses and just learn it and get on with life rather than trying to make life fit your particular vision of reality. Why is it when you're backed into a corner you play the liberal card? I have an RNC card in my wallet how about you? |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Ol Carter pretty much pegged you to a tee. Really? I'm not the one who is incapable of passing a CW test (and neither is he, for that matter), it be YOU who seems to be incapable and continues to come up with excuses as to why YOU shouldn't have to pass that test. In fact, you've even shown that you can come up with a handy excuse for not even taking the Tech exam. (Question pool). LMFAO at the newly born Liberal. You and (Ol) Carter should really get along! So if one disagrees with the great dxace their a liberal? No, never said that. You're a Liberal because you're making whiny excuses as to why you can't or won't undertake a particular task, just like Liberals are wont do. Like a little crybaby child you're simply ****ed that there is something on a test that you are unwilling to do. And like the little crybaby child you're going to whine, cry and complain until you get your way. It's simply a fact of life that the code test is currently there, either pass it or go without the ticket. It's that or let life pass you by and/or catch up with your inability to perform a certain task. (i.e. the code requirement is dropped) Such logic. Explains a lot, thanks. LMFAO yet again. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Just what point was that? I can use it any time I so desire (and did so yesterday, 'tard boy. Please try to pay attention.), YOU, on the other hand, do not have that option. LMFAO at the newly minted Liberal. Yes, yesterday on VHF. So basically your code license is doing nothing for you except give your fragile ego a boost. |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Me? Whine? If you think I'm whining then you've clearly missed the point, 'tard boy. It's those who are to lazy to learn a measly 5 WPM who are doing the whining. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! LMFAO It's those that shun progress that whine the most. How does dropping a code test equate to 'progress'? I might buy the fact that without it, you might 'progress' to HF privileges, but beyond that, it'll take a heap of convincing. Stop making Liberal excuses and just learn it and get on with life rather than trying to make life fit your particular vision of reality. Why is it when you're backed into a corner you play the liberal card? Just how am I backed into a corner? It's YOU who don't have the license. It's you who are whining about the code test. It's YOU who have even made up a lame excuse as to why YOU haven't even taken the Tech exam. I've done all that, so how does it equate that I'm backed into a corner? I have an RNC card in my wallet how about you? What does that prove? That you signed up? Other than that, it proves nothing. You are free to go into that polling booth and cast your vote for Liberals all day long. Try again. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Just what point was that? I can use it any time I so desire (and did so yesterday, 'tard boy. Please try to pay attention.), YOU, on the other hand, do not have that option. LMFAO at the newly minted Liberal. Yes, yesterday on VHF. So basically your code license is doing nothing for you except give your fragile ego a boost. Pay attention 'tard. I can use that code license ANYTIME I so choose. YOU, on the other hand cannot! What part about that don't you understand? LMFAO at the clueless yet again. dxAce Michigan USA |
New Technician License
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Just how am I backed into a corner? It's YOU who don't have the license. It's you who are whining about the code test. It's YOU who have even made up a lame excuse as to why YOU haven't even taken the Tech exam. So let's hear just ONE vaild reason to keep the code requirement in. |
Hi Mike
I noticed he's now calling you a Tard. Tell Ace to go f--k himself. His Tard **** is wearing thin. B.H. |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Just how am I backed into a corner? It's YOU who don't have the license. It's you who are whining about the code test. It's YOU who have even made up a lame excuse as to why YOU haven't even taken the Tech exam. So let's hear just ONE vaild reason to keep the code requirement in. It's just a 'question' on the test, get over it already and stop trying to obtain some validation for your inability to learn something. LMFAO dxAce Michigan USA |
Hi Mike
Brian Hill wrote: I noticed he's now calling you a Tard. Tell Ace to go f--k himself. Why don't you just tell me yourself. Got some kind of problem? dxAce Michigan USA |
Hi Mike
"Brian Hill" wrote in message ... I noticed he's now calling you a Tard. Tell Ace to go f--k himself. His Tard **** is wearing thin. B.H. I hope you see this Ace! You need to chill out! B.H. |
Hi Mike
Brian Hill wrote: "Brian Hill" wrote in message ... I noticed he's now calling you a Tard. Tell Ace to go f--k himself. His Tard **** is wearing thin. B.H. I hope you see this Ace! You need to chill out! Perhaps you just need to obtain a clue? dxAce Michigan USA |
Hi Mike
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Brian Hill wrote: I noticed he's now calling you a Tard. Tell Ace to go f--k himself. Why don't you just tell me yourself. Got some kind of problem? dxAce Michigan USA No you do Steve. Has Mike ever called you a Tard? What's with this tard **** anyway. Doe's every argument you engage in have to be reduced to name calling? B.H. |
New Technician License
MnMikew wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Just what point was that? I can use it any time I so desire (and did so yesterday, 'tard boy. Please try to pay attention.), YOU, on the other hand, do not have that option. LMFAO at the newly minted Liberal. Yes, yesterday on VHF. So basically your code license is doing nothing for you except give your fragile ego a boost. And YOU want someone to change the licensing requirements so that YOU can give YOUR fragile ego a boost. I gave my ego a boost a long time ago by actually passing the exam! dxAce Michigan USA |
Hi Mike
Brian Hill wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Brian Hill wrote: I noticed he's now calling you a Tard. Tell Ace to go f--k himself. Why don't you just tell me yourself. Got some kind of problem? dxAce Michigan USA No you do Steve. Has Mike ever called you a Tard? What's with this tard **** anyway. Doe's every argument you engage in have to be reduced to name calling? I just have to call 'em as I see 'em. Getting back to my original question... is there some reason you can't tell me to go f--k myself on your own, or do you need a sock puppet to do that? dxAce Michigan USA |
Hi Mike
"dxAce" wrote in message Getting back to my original question... is there some reason you can't tell me to go f--k myself on your own, or do you need a sock puppet to do that? dxAce Michigan USA I think I already did Steve. It was a public post. If you have a problem with how it was served? then be specific! I aim to please. B.H. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com