New Technician License
 

an old friend wrote:

dxAce wrote:
Mark Zenier wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Probably more 'into' radio than you are, 'tard boy!

Then why don't you have your Advanced?

What does that have to do with being 'into' radio?

it has more to do with radio of anykind than your giving all radio
users a bad with "tards" coments

"ALL", 'tard boy?

You obviously didn't put your thinking cap on before replying. OH.. that's
right, you don't have one.

LMFAO at the 'tard, yet again.

Run along, boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New Technician License
 

dxAce wrote:
an old friend wrote:

dxAce wrote:
Mark Zenier wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Probably more 'into' radio than you are, 'tard boy!

Then why don't you have your Advanced?

What does that have to do with being 'into' radio?

it has more to do with radio of anykind than your giving all radio
users a bad with "tards" coments

"ALL", 'tard boy?

yep all

you give all of us a bad name

New Technician License
 

Buzzygirl wrote:
"Panzer240" wrote...
Should it be removed as a requirement? Possibly, but if so it should be
replaced with much stiffer technical examinations, including an above
average user levl computer component, than what currently exsists.

This has come up frequently in conversations I've had with long-time hams.
While I don't disagree with you in principle, there is no way the FCC is
going to toughen up the exams.

The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that there
would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually pushed
no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame
question pool already used for Technician licenses.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

New Technician License
 

Everytime we are typing on a computer keyboard we are typing code,1's
and 0's.Learn the ABC's,,, learn the Dit's and Dah's.
cuhulin

New Technician License
 

clifto wrote:
cut
The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that there
would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually pushed
no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame
question pool already used for Technician licenses.

who made this promise?

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

New Technician License
 

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

an old friend wrote:

dxAce wrote:
Mark Zenier wrote:

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Probably more 'into' radio than you are, 'tard boy!

Then why don't you have your Advanced?

What does that have to do with being 'into' radio?

it has more to do with radio of anykind than your giving all radio
users a bad with "tards" coments

"ALL", 'tard boy?

You obviously didn't put your thinking cap on before replying. OH.. that's
right, you don't have one.

LMFAO at the 'tard, yet again.

Run along, boy.

I'd settle for him not changing his handle. Looks like he keeps getting
kicked from one Internet service after another.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

New Technician License
 

an old friend wrote:
clifto wrote:
cut
The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that there
would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually pushed
no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame
question pool already used for Technician licenses.

who made this promise?

I got it indirectly, so I don't know. But I got it from people I trusted, and
still trust.

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

New Technician License
 

an old friend wrote:

not long ago?

more than 20 years


Apparently the point was lost on you?

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

New Technician License
 

Brian Denley wrote:
an old friend wrote:

not long ago?

more than 20 years


Apparently the point was lost on you?

not at all then of course your radical editing makes me guess at
exactly what was said

but clearly someone said that something was "not long ago" but was more
than 20 yars ago

which is certainly a LONG time ago in any tech related feild

but if you have to resort to ****ing the context that badly to try and
make a point you obviously did not have one in the first place

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

New Technician License
 

clifto wrote:
an old friend wrote:
clifto wrote:
cut
The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that there
would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually pushed
no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame
question pool already used for Technician licenses.

who made this promise?

I got it indirectly, so I don't know. But I got it from people I trusted, and
still trust.

prehaps your trust is misplaced

the only body with the POWER to make that promise and keep was the FCC,
today the NEVEC could make it but then only the FCC, and I have found
no evidence they ever made any such promise

I have Heard the ARRL said something like this may have been said by
the ARRL but they lack the power to make such a pledge

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.

New Technician License
 

"clifto" wrote in message
...
an old friend wrote:
clifto wrote:
cut
The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that
there
would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually
pushed
no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame
question pool already used for Technician licenses.

who made this promise?

I got it indirectly, so I don't know. But I got it from people I trusted,
and
still trust.
Ohoh. I better take the test soon so a "tard" like me can pass it. :-)

New Technician License
 

MnMikew wrote:
"clifto" wrote in message
...
an old friend wrote:
clifto wrote:
cut
The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that
there
would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually
pushed
no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame
question pool already used for Technician licenses.

who made this promise?

I got it indirectly, so I don't know. But I got it from people I trusted,
and
still trust.
Ohoh. I better take the test soon so a "tard" like me can pass it. :-)
well given the control of the pool by the NEVEC's QPC i see no reason
to sorry

my advice stand to anyone geting the tech license now take a shot at
code for the generl but don't sweat it it willgo away soon

New Technician License
 

Radioguy68 wrote:
well given the control of the pool by the NEVEC's QPC i see no reason
to sorry

my advice stand to anyone geting the tech license now take a shot at
code for the generl but don't sweat it it willgo away soon


Maybe the ham exams should include basic spelling.
they could but why?

New Technician License
 

Radioguy68 wrote:
well given the control of the pool by the NEVEC's QPC i see no reason
to sorry

my advice stand to anyone geting the tech license now take a shot at
code for the generl but don't sweat it it willgo away soon


Maybe the ham exams should include basic spelling.
why?

how does spelling ability relate to radio?

you don't like my writing feel to not read it

New Technician License
 

Radioguy68 wrote:

well given the control of the pool by the NEVEC's QPC i see no reason
to sorry

my advice stand to anyone geting the tech license now take a shot at
code for the generl but don't sweat it it willgo away soon

Maybe the ham exams should include basic spelling.

That and a mental competency test.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New Technician License
 

dxAce wrote:
Radioguy68 wrote:

well given the control of the pool by the NEVEC's QPC i see no reason
to sorry

my advice stand to anyone geting the tech license now take a shot at
code for the generl but don't sweat it it willgo away soon

Maybe the ham exams should include basic spelling.

That and a mental competency test.

ah so you do indeed want to kill off the ARS that test of course should
applied at every renewnal that should the ARS size about 90 percent in
10 years

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New Technician License
 

an_old_friend wrote:

dxAce wrote:
Radioguy68 wrote:

well given the control of the pool by the NEVEC's QPC i see no reason
to sorry

my advice stand to anyone geting the tech license now take a shot at
code for the generl but don't sweat it it willgo away soon

Maybe the ham exams should include basic spelling.

That and a mental competency test.

ah so you do indeed want to kill off the ARS that test of course should
applied at every renewnal that should the ARS size about 90 percent in
10 years

You've an amazing imagination, 'tard boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New Technician License
 

dxAce wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

dxAce wrote:
cut
ah so you do indeed want to kill off the ARS that test of course should
applied at every renewnal that should the ARS size about 90 percent in
10 years

You've an amazing imagination, 'tard boy.

well I do have an imaginantion that sure beats out your senile old mind

dxAce
Michigan
USA

New Technician License
 

Radioguy68 wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:16:00 -0500, dxAce
wrote:

cut


Hey Steve, maybe we could use his proficient spelling and call him
'turd boy.

i notice you are to cowardly to leave out there

New Technician License
 

What's the problem? (I dont go no problems) Just gor hed on anna
practice,practcie,practicie (I wanderedddd againnnn,,,,, to my home in
the Mountains,,,,, by the Practice we will seeeee,,,,,, Rank Strangers
to Me) with them dits and dahs and get your new Technician License.

Twinky little dummmmm,,,,, twinky little deeeeee,,,,,, Humphrey Bogart
anna Katherine Hepburn in this old,old African Queen movie on Radio tb
(tb,Dennis the Menance,tb)
cuhulin