"clifto" wrote in message
...
an old friend wrote:
clifto wrote:
cut
The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that
there
would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually
pushed
no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame
question pool already used for Technician licenses.

who made this promise?

I got it indirectly, so I don't know. But I got it from people I trusted,
and
still trust.
Ohoh. I better take the test soon so a "tard" like me can pass it. :-)

MnMikew wrote:
"clifto" wrote in message
...
an old friend wrote:
clifto wrote:
cut
The promise made when the original no-code proposal was new was that
there
would be a MUCH more difficult technical exam. When they actually
pushed
no-code through, they added five measly questions from the same lame
question pool already used for Technician licenses.

who made this promise?

I got it indirectly, so I don't know. But I got it from people I trusted,
and
still trust.
Ohoh. I better take the test soon so a "tard" like me can pass it. :-)
well given the control of the pool by the NEVEC's QPC i see no reason
to sorry

my advice stand to anyone geting the tech license now take a shot at
code for the generl but don't sweat it it willgo away soon