Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"junius" wrote: Hello folks, I have a question here... I recently bought one of these excellent Par Electronic EF-SWL antennas. As the supplied radiator can be disconnected and another wire be hooked onto the 9:1 transformer, I was thinking to give a go at hooking up a 150 foot length of wire that I have on hand. My question is this: in hooking up an alternate wire to the transformer, would the antenna lose its characteristics as a 1-30 MHz antenna? Would an antenna tuner then be required? Very curious for info on this. I'm afraid I don't know too terribly much about antenna theory. Thanks in advance for any help provided, Just give it a try and see if it works well for you. The impedance of the wire is determined by its diameter and height above ground not the length. The 9:1 UNUN is a good choice. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article . com, "junius" wrote: Hello folks, I have a question here... I recently bought one of these excellent Par Electronic EF-SWL antennas. As the supplied radiator can be disconnected and another wire be hooked onto the 9:1 transformer, I was thinking to give a go at hooking up a 150 foot length of wire that I have on hand. My question is this: in hooking up an alternate wire to the transformer, would the antenna lose its characteristics as a 1-30 MHz antenna? Would an antenna tuner then be required? Very curious for info on this. I'm afraid I don't know too terribly much about antenna theory. Thanks in advance for any help provided, Just give it a try and see if it works well for you. The impedance of the wire is determined by its diameter and height above ground not the length. The 9:1 UNUN is a good choice. -- Telamon Ventura, California Hi Junius et al, There is no magic about the 45' length. It is a nice tradeoff between performance and ease of deployment. The military also had a bit of a say so. Anyway, the transformer looks good to well below MW, so that is not an issue. The longer length, as one poster suggested, will improve MW performance. If the antenna is high (in terms of wavelength) a number of nulls (in addition to multiple gain lobes) will be seen at HF. Neither is very useful as the antenna cannot be rotated. Some receivers may overload with the increased signal strength from MW. One of ther nice features of this antenna is the fact that both secondary ( antenna side) and primary ( coaxial feed side) grounds are separately available on 10-32 stainless studs at the matchbox. They come supplied from us with the two grounds strapped together. This may or may not be the optimum configuration for your location and noise sources- experimenting with the grounding, as detailed in the manual may make a much bigger difference in S/N than increasing the wire length. GL, Dale W4OP for PAR Electronics, Inc. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passive Repeater | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
WHY - The simple Random Wire Antenna is better than the Dipole Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL) | Shortwave | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment |