dxAce wrote:



If you wish to talk about 160 meter contacts I suggest as I have before that you
find a suitable amateur radio group!

....and I suggest you re-direct your thinly veiled complaint to the
person who wrote the *original* post about a 160 meter amateur radio
contest; I was just responding to his original post.

dxAce wrote:

Never stated that I had much experience on 160,...

....so maybe that means you shouldn't try and pass yourself off as an
expert then.

To call it that as you have and as Mr. Devoldere seems to indicate is
simply not precise, correct, or factual.

Well, the preeminent Mr. Devoldere *does* have a *lot* of 160
experience, being one of the top two 160 guys in the world.
Additionally, he is a renowned low band author and is recognized as
the top low band propagation authority in the world. You, on the other
hand, have no actual credentials or acceptance by others as a world
class expert like Mr. Devoldere.

He *is* the world's recognized low band propagation expert.

You aint.

Quite delusional of you, you know...but please feel free to continue
your quest to become a Legend in Your Own Mind...(and it does sorta tie
in with your egotistical self-appointment as an "ace")

"Carter, K8VT" wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Never stated that I had much experience on 160,...

...so maybe that means you shouldn't try and pass yourself off as an
expert then.

To call it that as you have and as Mr. Devoldere seems to indicate is
simply not precise, correct, or factual.

Well, the preeminent Mr. Devoldere *does* have a *lot* of 160
experience, being one of the top two 160 guys in the world.
Additionally, he is a renowned low band author and is recognized as
the top low band propagation authority in the world. You, on the other
hand, have no actual credentials or acceptance by others as a world
class expert like Mr. Devoldere.

He *is* the world's recognized low band propagation expert.

You aint.

Never said I was, but once again, if it's NOT propagation ALONG the grey line
then it is not grey line propagation.

I suggest you take the matter up with Mr. Devoldere.


Quite delusional of you, you know...but please feel free to continue
your quest to become a Legend in Your Own Mind...(and it does sorta tie
in with your egotistical self-appointment as an "ace")

That's all very nice.

Since this is a 'shortwave' oriented newsgroup and not an amateur one, perhaps
you'll share your SWBC listening/dx'ing experiences and loggings with us.

SWBC countries heard, SWBC countries QSL'd, etc.

Looking forward to seeing your 'expert' input.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:

"Carter, K8VT" wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Never stated that I had much experience on 160,...
...so maybe that means you shouldn't try and pass yourself off as an
expert then.

To call it that as you have and as Mr. Devoldere seems to indicate is
simply not precise, correct, or factual.
Well, the preeminent Mr. Devoldere *does* have a *lot* of 160
experience, being one of the top two 160 guys in the world.
Additionally, he is a renowned low band author and is recognized as
the top low band propagation authority in the world. You, on the other
hand, have no actual credentials or acceptance by others as a world
class expert like Mr. Devoldere.

He *is* the world's recognized low band propagation expert.

You aint.



Never said I was, but once again, if it's NOT propagation ALONG the grey line
then it is not grey line propagation.

I suggest you take the matter up with Mr. Devoldere.

*I* believe him--*you* are the one that doesn't. Therefore, logic would
dictate that *you* take it up with him.

Since this is a 'shortwave' oriented newsgroup and not an amateur one, perhaps
you'll share your SWBC listening/dx'ing experiences and loggings with us.

1) Again, I did not place the *original* post, just responded to and
supported *his* comments about interesting sunrise propagation during a
*ham* contest. I yet again suggest you take up your thinly veiled
complaint with the person who originally posted about the '180 meter'
amateur radio contest.

2) Last time I looked, amateur radio (at least HF) *IS* 'shortwave
oriented'.

3) As pointed out previously, whether it's 'one-way' or 'two-way', DX is
still DX.

4) Finally, I seem to recall *you* originating *numerous* posts
regarding the 3Y0X AMATEUR RADIO dx'pedition.

If I didn't know any better, it would seem that you are implying it's OK
for *you* to post topics with an amateur radio slant but that no one
else can, even if only in response to someone else's post. Seems a bit
hypocritical of you, don't you think? (just politely asking...)

Looking forward to seeing your 'expert' input.

Well, your wires are a bit crossed--I said consistently that *Devoldere*
was the low band propagation expert, not me (*or* you). I never claimed
to be an expert on propagation or otherwise, unlike some 'aces' on this NG.

"Carter, K8VT" wrote:

4) Finally, I seem to recall *you* originating *numerous* posts
regarding the 3Y0X AMATEUR RADIO dx'pedition.

Indeed! From a LISTENING perspective, 'tard boy.

Now try and get your panties out of a knot and always remember: if it's NOT
propagation ALONG the grey line then it is not grey line propagation.

dxAce
Michigan
USA