Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"N9NEO" wrote: Telamon - Can you please explain mutual inductance? Is that like coupling coeficcient sp? Yes. Here is an interesting physics experiment with explanation. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_14/6.html If we short one winding out and measure the other winding's inductance then we will have a measure of the coupling between the two coils. The problem with this is if you short either coil the other will also be shorted. The transformer through the mutual inductance coupling between them effects an impedance transfer dependent on the turns ratio. You short one coil and guess what? The 0 ohm short is coupled to the other coil. If you have the equipment you can measure the self inductance of one coil and watch that value drop when you short the ends of the other coil together. Better coupling will result in a bigger change in inductance. The lower the inductance measured then the lower the stray inductance - or supposedly the better the coupling. With fewer turns then I think maybe the lower the stray leakage we will measure. Am I on the right track? The idea here is high mutual inductance or coupling between the coils and have the self inductance of each coil approximate the impedance of the wire on one coil and the value of coax on the other. Also you want the path through the windings to be an electrically short path so the UNUN will work on the high frequency end. I think the balun design can use the very small cores as long as we dont want to transmit. Correct? I am thinking that since the voltage we will see across the coil In receive mode is microvolts then we don't have to worry too much about wasting power magnitizing the core. So then use only a very small number of turns. I have to build a balun too for a T2FD I am putting in the attic. I have Doug DeMaw's ferrite design book that I will open tonight when I get home. Not so many good places to find info on receive baluns on www. There is stuff around on the net but a good book is better bet. BALUN and UNUN design can get a little complicated when you want broad bandwidth. If you have a book with a proven design worked out for an antenna that is a great way to hack a BALUN or UNUN. The thread started out with you grabbing what was on hand and just following a few rules will get an UNUN working pretty close to optimal with just the stuff on hand on at least part of the SW spectrum. With the unknown core on hand the hack would be the minimum or nearly minimum number of turns in both primary and secondary windings to get the impedance ratio you need to get. The winding technique changes the performance character of the transformer. If you wind primary and secondary apart from each other you will cause all or nearly all the flux linkage to go through the core. The consequence of this is the cores have an efficient frequency range and chances are it will not work so well through the entire SW band range of 3 to 30 MHz. If you wind them together then the two coils couple to each other directly in addition to the common flux linkage generated in the core. If the core response is good on the low end and drops off on the high end the close coil to coil coupling will help on the high end as an example. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|