Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I prefer the performance of the 7600G. I generally prefered running a length of wire to improve the sensitivity of the '909, whereas I didn't always find this to be required for the 7600G. I tended to run both off of batteries, rather than off AC. The '909 is something of a battery hog, whereas the 7600G is not. As for selectivity, while I liked having two bandwidths w/the '909, the 7600G's synchronous selectable sideband can be a real life-saver in dealing w/adjacent channel interference (as well as fading). Given a choice between either dual bandwidth filters or synchronous selectable sideband (in conjunction w/one well chosen bandwidth filter) in a compact portable, I guess I'd go (as I have) with the latter. Sold the '909 and haven't regretted having done so.
__________________
Into blinding darkness enter those who worship ignorance; and those who delight in knowledge enter into still greater darkness, as it were. -- Isavasya Upanishad |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Junius wrote: I prefer the performance of the 7600G. I generally prefered running a length of wire to improve the sensitivity of the '909, whereas I didn't always find this to be required for the 7600G. I tended to run both off of batteries, rather than off AC. The '909 is something of a battery hog, whereas the 7600G is not. As for selectivity, while I liked having two bandwidths w/the '909, the 7600G's synchronous selectable sideband can be a real life-saver in dealing w/adjacent channel interference (as well as fading). Given a choice between either dual bandwidth filters or synchronous selectable sideband (in conjunction w/one well chosen bandwidth filter) in a compact portable, I guess I'd go (as I have) with the latter. Sold the '909 and haven't regretted having done so. The batteries seem to last well for me also. I attribute some of this longevity to the fact that I use earphones a lot and they don't take as much power to drive as the built in speaker. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
The batteries seem to last well for me also. I attribute some of this longevity to the fact that I use earphones a lot and they don't take as much power to drive as the built in speaker. So do I, I'm running on ni-mh 1700 mAh rechargeable batteries and it last 2 to 4 weeks depending on how often/long I listen to the radio. I can't speak for the 7600 I never had, but I have also the Sony SW100 and sensitivity of the 909 is above the Sony. The Sync of the Sony does help sometimes, but often the 909 has a better signal anyway. I'll stay with the 909 for the DX with an external antenna... And yes, the tuning knob is quite compfortable... Charly |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sangean ATS-909 vs. Sony ICF-7600GR | Shortwave | |||
Sangean PT-80, Sony will stop making SW radios ... | Shortwave | |||
Sony ICF-SW7600 / Sony ICF-SW7600G / Sony ICF-SW7600GR AM/FM Shortwave Radio Information & Links | Shortwave | |||
POLL: ICF-2010 or ICF-7600GR | Shortwave |