Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 8th 06, 06:03 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
N9NEO
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why antennas aren't necessary for shortwave listening.

A couple of years ago I bought a Racal RA17 receiver. I used it for a
few months and now it patiently waits for me to go thru it more
completely. I think it has a noisy circuit in it now.

I recall listening in on some 75m guys when I realized I hadn't
connected up the antenna. Granted many in the 75m crowd are probably
running CB type power levels, but on the other hand my shack is down in
the basement. I tuned around the bands and was surprised what the
radio would do sans antenna.

I'm not sure what kind of a front end the Racal has in it but it
certainly is a sensitive beast. I hope to one day get it out of the
inbasket and back into the shack. I would like to put it next to
another SP600. I had to sell my SP600 in order to get the Drake R8B.
The R8B is of course my favorite.

So there ya go. Now if somebody knows what the Racal has for front end
please tell.

73
Bob
N9NEO

  #2   Report Post  
Old March 8th 06, 06:43 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why antennas aren't necessary for shortwave listening.

On 8 Mar 2006 10:03:33 -0800, "N9NEO" wrote:

A couple of years ago I bought a Racal RA17 receiver. I used it for a
few months and now it patiently waits for me to go thru it more
completely. I think it has a noisy circuit in it now.

I recall listening in on some 75m guys when I realized I hadn't
connected up the antenna. Granted many in the 75m crowd are probably
running CB type power levels, but on the other hand my shack is down in
the basement. I tuned around the bands and was surprised what the
radio would do sans antenna.

I'm not sure what kind of a front end the Racal has in it but it
certainly is a sensitive beast. I hope to one day get it out of the
inbasket and back into the shack. I would like to put it next to
another SP600. I had to sell my SP600 in order to get the Drake R8B.
The R8B is of course my favorite.

So there ya go. Now if somebody knows what the Racal has for front end
please tell.

73
Bob
N9NEO

The Racal is an excellent receiver.

Probably just has a bad thermionic device.

The receiver is deceptively quiet but it is indeed sensitive. Works
well on SSB with the BFO, if you back off the IF gain a tad.

  #3   Report Post  
Old March 8th 06, 07:29 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why antennas aren't necessary for shortwave listening.

In article . com,
"N9NEO" wrote:

A couple of years ago I bought a Racal RA17 receiver. I used it for
a few months and now it patiently waits for me to go thru it more
completely. I think it has a noisy circuit in it now.

I recall listening in on some 75m guys when I realized I hadn't
connected up the antenna. Granted many in the 75m crowd are probably
running CB type power levels, but on the other hand my shack is down
in the basement. I tuned around the bands and was surprised what the
radio would do sans antenna.

I'm not sure what kind of a front end the Racal has in it but it
certainly is a sensitive beast. I hope to one day get it out of the
inbasket and back into the shack. I would like to put it next to
another SP600. I had to sell my SP600 in order to get the Drake R8B.
The R8B is of course my favorite.

So there ya go. Now if somebody knows what the Racal has for front
end please tell.


This indicates a problem with the radio. My best guess is that the
signals are coming in the power mains and coupling to the antenna
input. You will not be able to control what you hear with the antenna
connected to the radio.

You could try some power line filtering to see if the signals go away
with no antenna connected. If you don't solve this then obviously you
will be hearing a lot of power line noise on the radio.

Another thing to try would be a 50 ohm resistor with short or shielded
leads. With the resistor across the antenna input the radio should be
quiet.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #4   Report Post  
Old March 8th 06, 08:33 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
Bob Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why antennas aren't necessary for shortwave listening.

On 8 Mar 2006 10:03:33 -0800, "N9NEO" wrote:


I'm not sure what kind of a front end the Racal has in it but it
certainly is a sensitive beast. I hope to one day get it out of the
inbasket and back into the shack. I would like to put it next to
another SP600. I had to sell my SP600 in order to get the Drake R8B.
The R8B is of course my favorite.

So there ya go. Now if somebody knows what the Racal has for front end
please tell.

73
Bob
N9NEO


I recently picked up a used Sony 2010 and was astounded that it would
pick up the nightly 3922 net with just the built-in 47" whip antenna,
even the 100 watt guys 500 miles out.

bob
k5qwg
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 8th 06, 09:01 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
David
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why antennas aren't necessary for shortwave listening.

On 8 Mar 2006 10:03:33 -0800, "N9NEO" wrote:

A couple of years ago I bought a Racal RA17 receiver. I used it for a
few months and now it patiently waits for me to go thru it more
completely. I think it has a noisy circuit in it now.

I recall listening in on some 75m guys when I realized I hadn't
connected up the antenna. Granted many in the 75m crowd are probably
running CB type power levels, but on the other hand my shack is down in
the basement. I tuned around the bands and was surprised what the
radio would do sans antenna.

I'm not sure what kind of a front end the Racal has in it but it
certainly is a sensitive beast. I hope to one day get it out of the
inbasket and back into the shack. I would like to put it next to
another SP600. I had to sell my SP600 in order to get the Drake R8B.
The R8B is of course my favorite.

So there ya go. Now if somebody knows what the Racal has for front end
please tell.

73
Bob
N9NEO

There's a lot of LC filtering in the front-end. I'm sure that's
probably grabbing some energy.



  #6   Report Post  
Old March 9th 06, 02:52 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
N9NEO
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why antennas aren't necessary for shortwave listening.

Bingo. I think I recall some High Q tunable LC circuits in the front
end. And yes, perhaps some of the energy coming in the power leads,
but I wouldn't be so quick to call that a problem. Call it a design
feature Anyway, yes, a nice receiver.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AM/MW Antennas for the Eton E1 Radio to Improved AM/MW Reception RHF Shortwave 0 November 10th 05 10:11 AM
"Bow Tie" {Paired} Dipole Antennas for improved Shortwave Listening (SWL) RHF Shortwave 0 October 30th 05 12:27 PM
The "Almost" Delta Loop Antenna for Limited Space Shortwave Listening (SWL) made from TV 'type' Parts RHF Shortwave 0 October 16th 05 12:34 PM
Understanding Shortwave Radio Listening and Antenna Design and Construction RHF Shortwave 3 February 13th 04 07:16 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017