Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() HFguy wrote: Because ham's use mostly SSB on the HF bands. A sync' detector is not useful for that mode. Sure, I realize and appreciate that. But as I said earlier, these transceivers have a general coverage receiver section...it's not as though amateur communications is of any account, for instance, in the MW BCB or the int'l SW BCBs. Through these online fora, it's apparent that a significant number of radio amateurs have an interest in the reception of signals in these bands. Moreover, how much of a further investment would be required to give a transceiver a greater edge in this area? From what I can see, this might be done simply with the addition of AM Sync detector circuitry and the expansion of the DSP variable bandwidth control from the SSB range on up to 6.0 kHz or so. The technology already there, so... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Receiver Upgrade Query | Shortwave | |||
Coax Losses ? | Antenna | |||
Pro-96 CPU upgrade insanity | Scanner | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment |