LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 20th 06, 02:03 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
junius
 
Posts: n/a
Default Receiver Upgrade Query


HFguy wrote:


Because ham's use mostly SSB on the HF bands. A sync' detector is not
useful for that mode.


Sure, I realize and appreciate that. But as I said earlier, these
transceivers have a general coverage receiver section...it's not as
though amateur communications is of any account, for instance, in the
MW BCB or the int'l SW BCBs. Through these online fora, it's apparent
that a significant number of radio amateurs have an interest in the
reception of signals in these bands. Moreover, how much of a further
investment would be required to give a transceiver a greater edge in
this area? From what I can see, this might be done simply with the
addition of AM Sync detector circuitry and the expansion of the DSP
variable bandwidth control from the SSB range on up to 6.0 kHz or so.
The technology already there, so...



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Receiver Upgrade Query Telamon Shortwave 0 April 19th 06 06:35 AM
Coax Losses ? Robert11 Antenna 4 February 14th 06 05:37 PM
Pro-96 CPU upgrade insanity [email protected] Scanner 3 March 1st 05 07:58 AM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Equipment 4 September 8th 03 03:20 AM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Equipment 0 September 6th 03 08:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017