Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:14:43 GMT, HFguy wrote:
Although it doesn't cost that much these days to extend the range of an HF-transceiver for general coverage, it could be harder to come up with a good sync' detector that doesn't infringe on another manufacturers design. Look what happened to the R-75. I'm sure Icom knows how to design a good sync' detector but there may have been legal limitations to what they could implement. This could be the main reason the manufacturers are not interested in adding a sync' detector to a general coverage HF-transceiver. I also don't think it's really so "apparent that a significant number of radio amateurs have an interest" in listening to international shortwave broadcasts. It's been my experience that few do. Synchronous detection is old enough to be in the public domain. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Receiver Upgrade Query | Shortwave | |||
Coax Losses ? | Antenna | |||
Pro-96 CPU upgrade insanity | Scanner | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment |