Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" wrote in message ... On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:46:36 -0500, clifto wrote: David wrote: wrote: Are you sure about the patent cost? I thought sync detection was mostly implemented through a PLL type circuit. A PLL and a Product Detector You can do without the PLL, too. You just create the signal with a separate stage that overamplifies the signal into clipping, then you have basically a sorta-square wave to feed into the product detector. Does that work when the station carrier fades? Not as well in deep fades as a 'truly' synchronous detector. That's often called a 'quasi-synchronous' detector since there is not a synchronised oscillator, just the amplified carrier, mixed with the signal in the product detector. Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Receiver Upgrade Query | Shortwave | |||
Coax Losses ? | Antenna | |||
Pro-96 CPU upgrade insanity | Scanner | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment | |||
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit | Equipment |