Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
junius wrote:
Overall, my preference tilts slightly toward the SW8, in a comparison of the E1 and SW8, although there have been more than a few times that the E1 has produced a more usable copy on a signal than the SW8. How would you compare the performance of those two receivers when using their whip antennas on HF? The SW8 is known for being somewhat insensitive on it's whip, particularly the earlier versions. Drake made an improvement to the whip in 1994 by redesigning the matching impedance of the whip's input circuit. Contrary to what some believe, Drake never added a pre-amp to the SW8 whip circuit. However this was done on the Sat-800 which is closely related to the SW8. It's why the Sat-800 is more sensitive on it's whip for HF than the SW8. What year was your SW8 made? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ABOUT - The Eton {Etón} 'Elite' E5 AM/FM Shortwave Radio - Part II - | Shortwave | |||
Eton E1 Recall | Shortwave | |||
ABOUT - The RL Drake R8 - R8A - R8B Communication Receivers | Shortwave | |||
What the Eton E1 Rado is NOT ! -=V=- What It "IS" and What Not to Expect | Shortwave | |||
The Eton 'Elite' E1 XM Radio "Genealogy" Drake SW1 > SW2 > SW8 > GS800M > E1 XM | Shortwave |