Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() RHF wrote: Usually getting the Element of the Loop Antenna at least Three Feet above the Roof (Five Feet is better) will get the Loop out of the Building's RFI / EMF Noise Envelop. What technical foundation exists for this type of statement? craigm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CraigM,
Why - Elevate the Antenna Element 3-5 Feet Above the Roof ? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortw...a/message/9443 Just basic practical experience on my part and what I have read and been told over the years. FWIW - Elevating the Antenna Element 3-5 Feet 'above' the Roof may not always work in providing a Stronger Signal and Less Noise in all situations - but often it does. In general this statement applies to any Antenna Element around a House or Building or their Roof Line and Attic. Where 'possible' get the Antenna Element : * Off-the-Surface * Away-from-the-Surface * Out-and-Up-in-the-Air A few Feet of Space {Distance} Does Matter The Why - It just may result from the simple fact that as the Distance {Space} from a Source-of-Noise Increases the Signal Level of the Noise Decreases. So 'if' there is some Wiring or Equipment (Source-of-Noise) in the Attic Area : The Surface of the Roof would be closer and the Noise Stronger then if it were detected another 3-5 Feet away (Up Higher in the Air). Note - This 'assumes' a non-metal Roof Surface that may act as a Shield for any Noise emanating from the Attic of House. It goes without saying that 'if' there is Electrical Equipment on the Roof like Swamp-Coolers or Air-Conditioners then it is always a good idea (were practical) to place the Antenna Element away from such potential Sources-of-Noise. In Conclusion - It remains my recommendation that "Elevating" the Antenna Element 3-5 Feet 'above' the Surface of the Roof is the better place for it to be for a Cleaner RF Signal and Reduced Noise from the interior of the House. as always - iane ~ RHF |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , craigm
wrote: RHF wrote: Usually getting the Element of the Loop Antenna at least Three Feet above the Roof (Five Feet is better) will get the Loop out of the Building's RFI / EMF Noise Envelop. What technical foundation exists for this type of statement? Most any building materials have a dielectric constant higher than air (1) and tend to bend the electric field lines around the house. The field lines generated inside penetrating the outside tend to head toward earth. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon - Thank You !
and now I know one more fact - iane ~ RHF | | | / \ -------!------- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , craigm wrote: RHF wrote: Usually getting the Element of the Loop Antenna at least Three Feet above the Roof (Five Feet is better) will get the Loop out of the Building's RFI / EMF Noise Envelop. What technical foundation exists for this type of statement? Most any building materials have a dielectric constant higher than air (1) and tend to bend the electric field lines around the house. The field lines generated inside penetrating the outside tend to head toward earth. Are you saying the wood, fiberglass and shingles have enough effect to make three or five foot separation sufficient to reduce the field from noise generated inside a house? Why then would anyone have trouble with noise radiated from their neighbor's house? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , craigm
wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , craigm wrote: RHF wrote: Usually getting the Element of the Loop Antenna at least Three Feet above the Roof (Five Feet is better) will get the Loop out of the Building's RFI / EMF Noise Envelop. What technical foundation exists for this type of statement? Most any building materials have a dielectric constant higher than air (1) and tend to bend the electric field lines around the house. The field lines generated inside penetrating the outside tend to head toward earth. Are you saying the wood, fiberglass and shingles have enough effect to make three or five foot separation sufficient to reduce the field from noise generated inside a house? It is not a reduction as much as additional bending (refraction) of the field lines to follow the contour of the house to earth so the field strength falls off faster than it otherwise would without the difference in dielectric constant between the building materials and air. There is always some dielectric heating loss to add to that but at 1 to 30 MHz it would be very small. If noise from your neighbors house is bothering you there is a good chance it is diminished when it rains if the noise is radiating directly from the neighbors house because the building material dielectric constant would be much higher than when it is dry. Why then would anyone have trouble with noise radiated from their neighbor's house? Usually because the radiated noise induces currents in other nearby conductors around like gutters, utility lines that then re-radiate the noise. Some of the noise is EMI through common AC mains connections. Some of the noise generation is also RFI (far field) to begin with instead of just near field energy. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BTW Stevie were watch the news lately about NASA | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-NOV-03) | Shortwave |