![]() |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
Brenda Ann wrote:
They can market them all they want. I don't know anyone personally that will buy one. I'd buy one for $10 if it had a usable line out I could feed my stereo gear. Much more than that, and it's just not worth it to hear talk radio or Spanish music. -- Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... They can market them all they want. I don't know anyone personally that will buy one. I would not expect you would. Niether do I.. The consumer martketing just began this monthy. It's in a very early phase. They're just not willing to spend the sort of money to replace something that's been working just fine for them. What sort of money? You obviously don't know the price points of the next wave of receivers. And I doubt seriously that much of the general populus will want to replace the 5-10 analog radios they already have just for a joke of a digital signal. A signal which sounds better, doubles the FM station count, and gives AM decent quality. And it's "digital" which means a lot to the consumer. You keep talking about the contours.. well, those may look good on paper, they don't work in real life situations. That's amusing. We have two dozen of these on the air already, and in every case, the usable contour is greater for HD than for analog. The biggest benefit is to major market AMs where the ambient noise level means coverage is very limited. For FMs, we are finding a usable HD signal that goes beyond the 64 dbu, which is where almost all rated listening stops on analog. And rated listeners are all we care about, as that is how we make money. And that is the way it has been of 80 years or so. You'll learn that when people start tuning out of your stations en-masse. Funny, but nearly all our stations were up in Winter, including the HD enabled ones. Addin HD does not affect the ratings of the analog signal. It just expands th epotential for the future. I know that personally, I will never spend the money on IBOC receiving equipment. Since you don't even know how much it will cost in the next 18 months, that is a ludicrous statement. I won't spend a cent to replace something that has always worked with something of questionable value in general and no value whatsoever to me. Most people will feel that having twice the FM "stations" is well worht it. One time cost, tangible gain. IBOC interferes with adjacent channel stations. This is just poor engineering, and something that would never have been allowed in the days when the FCC was composed of engineers instead of greedy politicians. Since there is scan evidence that the adjacents are being listened to in the areas where the interference happens, this is irrelevant. I was just talking to a friend of mine on the Oregon coast who has been listening regularly to KONA in the tri-cities on 610 for decades. He can no longer listen to it because KPOJ 620 in Portland turned on their IBOC and is splattering 15KHz either side of their carrier. You can do your best to talk up this boondoggle, but most of us see it for what it is.. just another way for the NAB to screw the little guy, including the listeners. Actually, this was not an NAB project. The promotion of it is not NAB. The engineering was not NAB. A bunch of group owners decided that radio had to move into the digital domain, and financed iBiquity's early stock offerings. Some of the early adopters are small, like UnoRadio Group, a Puerto Rican company that is owned by a lifetime engineer who believes this is the best hope of radio for the future. So few people listen to far-off signals and so many will leave radio altogether if we do not modernize delivery that this is a small price to pay to stay off obselecence. I think you'll find that rather than buy expensive new radios, They will not be expensive as they roll out. My first CD player was $1,400. My first DVD player was nearly $700. My first VHS was over $800. My first walkman CD player was nearly $300. Now there are $19 DVD players, $14 CD walkman players and nobody wants a VHS device. that listeners will just turn off their radios and go to other entertainment modes.. this is already largely the case with Ipods, portable CD and MD players, etc. Which have been studied and found to not compete with radio, but, in many cases, create more radio listening. Just as 45's and cassettes and CDs did. They are complimentary. Most young people don't even own a radio anymore, it's too easy for them to get the music they want, load it onto a personal portable device, and hear what they want, when they want, without incessant DJ patter and endless advertisements. Radio does not program to young people. It can not afford to. Yet, 93% of teens use radio weekly, so your data is just about totally wrong. You have some kind of emotional reaction to this that does not allow you to see the reality of pricing, radio usage or the "digital" phenomenon. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... In every market, we have had good HD experiences on AM and FM... NY, Miami, Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Phoenix, LA, San Diego, San Francisco, etc. All our engineers like it, and love the sound. I call BS. I have personal reports that AM IBOC cannot be heard in downtown Manhattan on a display radio. I know ESB stations that can not be heard in stores 6 blocks away. Manhattan is a horrible place for FM. The fact is, our WCAA on HD has better usable coverage and better building penetration than the analog signal. As I have said, we are finding this to be uniformly true, which is why nearly all our 70 stations will be HD by the end of next year. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: Since nobody answered the modem, you were NOT contacted. Your phone line was attempted, and discarded when it did not have a human on the other end. Actually I was contacted -- by mail. Got the dollar bill and everything. But when I told them it wasn't my primary phone number they lost interest. Original contact is made by pone, not mail. So you are lying or changing the order of things. They also sent the dollar bill and contact information to the water system's billing address. The water association got a big laugh over it. Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. Don't tell me I wasn't contacted when I was. Once again it shows you to be in a bubble of unreality. I just checked with a person at Arbitron. The MRC approved methodology is phone contact followed by mailing of a BOX with the diary in it along with the incentive, phone confirmation of receipt, phone follow up after day 1, phone follow up after weekend, phone follow-up on Thursday for completion and mail-back. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... Yeah, well, *extremely* heavy emphasis has to be placed on "noise free" in order for this claim to be true. Otherwise it is patently false. Listeners do no significantly use metro AMs outside the 10 mv/m and FMs outside the 64 dbu, with 85% of listening in the 70 debu. The HD signal exceeds this. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... David Eduardo wrote: In every market, we have had good HD experiences on AM and FM... NY, Miami, Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Phoenix, LA, San Diego, San Francisco, etc. All our engineers like it, and love the sound. I'm glad your engineers are happy, but I suspect your advertisers are aiming at a slightly larger listening audience. We had our highest total ratings ever in Winter 2006. The advertisers are happy. Our company was awarded the only A+ for ratings performance by an investment firm that tracks radio as an industry. The HD signal exceeds the USABLE Am and FM coutours in every case... unless you are using the Boston Acoustics Receptor, which is a bad HD radio. Unless you have unreasonably high standards for what counts as 'usable', this is simply false. My standard is the contours where listening occurs. there have been plenty of studies of where most listening occurs, and where the drop-off contours are. Most of us have been tracking this sort of stuff since the 70's. |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"clifto" wrote in message ... Brenda Ann wrote: They can market them all they want. I don't know anyone personally that will buy one. I'd buy one for $10 if it had a usable line out I could feed my stereo gear. Much more than that, and it's just not worth it to hear talk radio or Spanish music. I did not know there was any station in the US that played much music from Spain. Of course, you meant "music in Spanish" I assume. ;-) |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
I have a personal repote.But you probally dont want to hear it because I
am really a dirty old man. cuhulin |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
"David Eduardo" wrote:
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: Since nobody answered the modem, you were NOT contacted. Your phone line was attempted, and discarded when it did not have a human on the other end. Actually I was contacted -- by mail. Got the dollar bill and everything. But when I told them it wasn't my primary phone number they lost interest. Original contact is made by pone, not mail. So you are lying or changing the order of things. Well, you better tell Arbitron that it has an imposter, then. They also sent the dollar bill and contact information to the water system's billing address. The water association got a big laugh over it. Arbitron does not recruit by mail. Ever. "BE PART OF THE RADIO RATINGS! "Whether you listen a little, a lot, or not at all, you are important. Yours is one of the few households in your area chosen to tell radio stations what you listen to. "It's easy and fun to take part in our radio survey. In just a few days, an Arbitron reasearch assistant will call with more details. Or, here is how to get started right away: "o Call 1-800-638-7091 and ask to speak with an Arbitron research assistant, or "o Enroll on line at www.enroll.arbitronratings.com by using the following serial number (ed: deleted) "Thanks for your help, "/s/ Steve Morris "President, Arbitron Ratings "PS: Please accept the small token of appreciation we have enclosed with the letter." ....but clearly again you know better than this letter how they recruit. Jeez, your idiocy never ends, does it? Don't tell me I wasn't contacted when I was. Once again it shows you to be in a bubble of unreality. I just checked with a person at Arbitron. The MRC approved methodology is phone contact followed by mailing of a BOX with the diary in it along with the incentive, phone confirmation of receipt, phone follow up after day 1, phone follow up after weekend, phone follow-up on Thursday for completion and mail-back. -- Eric F. Richards, "It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to create value. While it’s possible to make money in the short run without creating much value, in the long run it’s unsustainable. Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone." - Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006 |
Every 50 KW Clear Channel In The USA With A Difference
clifto wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote... Arbitron will never figure it out, too. Arbitron uses a percentage of RDD calls (Random Digit Dialing) to know prefixes. This is to pick up unlisted phones in proportion with their presence in each metro. Some will be inactive. Some will not answer. Some will be faxes. So they perform enough calls to get the proper quota of unlisted numbers to get market proportionality. It doesn't matter that the comedian expected to get the pie in his face, it's still funny to watch it happen. I dunno if you mean me or him. Below I enclosed the entire text of the letter sent to me, then having been rejected after they found out my modem phone number wasn't my primary voice mail -- their online registration actually told me that I wasn't the person at that number. The flat earth society lives -- at Arbitron and in the mind of Eduardo. -- Eric F. Richards, "It’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the purpose of a business is to make money. But the real purpose of a business is to create value. While it’s possible to make money in the short run without creating much value, in the long run it’s unsustainable. Even criminal organizations have to create value for someone." - Steve Pavlina, April 10, 2006 |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com