Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I assume you have proof of better than CD sound quality. So you are
saying HD FM is PCM? If not, please retract your statement. I really have no problem with digital radio schemes, but can't tolerate anything that screws up the current analog system. David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message oups.com... David Eduardo wrote: "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message om... [snip] Most listening is NOT to AM anymore. Why not accept tha tthis may be an opportunity to make AM move viable for the future? [snip] So, how does the future of AM radio differ if nighttime IBOC is approved or not? The quality is vastly better and can attract listeners for a change. People tune for content first, then comes quality. I hear HD isn't as good as XM, which makes is not as good as standardm FM. The quality of HD on FM is higher than CDs. On AM, it is slightly less. On XM, it is like a 128 kbs MP3. You choose. To me, satellite sounds the worst of all. Improving the signal to noise ratio or bandwidth of Gene Scott or Brother Stair would not make me listen. It is about the fidelity, and openness on AM. It is close to current FM analog quality. |