Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message ups.com... I assume you have proof of better than CD sound quality. So you are saying HD FM is PCM? If not, please retract your statement. It is higher quality than analog FM, which is limited in badwith. It is capable of being "better than CD" quality if only one digital stream is used on FM. The problem is that there is no material, other than live, to broadcast that way, so most staitons are doing two HD FM channels. Also, keep in mind most CDs do not sound very good, as the original recording was significantly compressed and distorted before the pressing. I really have no problem with digital radio schemes, but can't tolerate anything that screws up the current analog system. FM HD does not affect the quality of the analog signal. It may, in some cases, cause the inability to hear ultra fringe stations from other markets. But there is essentially no listening to such stations in such areas, so there is no loss if nothing existed before. AM analog has to be backed off to a 5 kHz to 7 kHz upper limit, but since most analog radios don't go that far even, there is no loss and actually the more limited bandwidth sounds better on many of today's radios. It certainly sounds no worse. I really can't see how any compressed audio will be better than PCM. Again, without hard facts on HD quality, I'll assume it isn't as good as PCM until shown otherwise. I can live with FM HD, but the reduced BW of the AM signal isn't a good idea. KCBS post HD sounds like KFI. [Hey, if I sounded as bad as KFI, I'd whisper my station ID too.] And the potential interference with out of town stations (i.e. where the hash of one IBOC channel sits on the analog signal of another station) is a real show stopper, especially if at night. You need to consider all those people who don't live in metropolitan areas, or even those driving on I-5. I can see HD leading to XM sales for those who do any rural travelling or live in the sticks. Since when does the FCC adopt a standard that hands money to one particular patent holder? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... David Eduardo wrote: wrote in message I can live with FM HD, but the reduced BW of the AM signal isn't a good idea. KCBS post HD sounds like KFI. [Hey, if I sounded as bad as KFI, I'd whisper my station ID too.] KFI is the #3 radio station in LA, the worlds largest radio market in terms of revenue. It is the 4th highest billing radio station in the US, and, maybe, the world. YOur subjective judgement on the quality seems to be unobserved by the 1.2 million Angelinos that listen each week. And the potential interference with out of town stations (i.e. where the hash of one IBOC channel sits on the analog signal of another station) is a real show stopper, especially if at night. However, there is no evidence that there is any appreciable listening to out of town AMs at night. You need to consider all those people who don't live in metropolitan areas, or even those driving on I-5. I can see HD leading to XM sales for those who do any rural travelling or live in the sticks. In most every part o fthe US, there are multiple FMs, even in western ND or on the Navajo Nation in AZ, to name a few. Nobody listens to fady AM when they have FM at hand, or other alternatives like satellite. AM clears used to get lots of truckers at night. But daytime, they had to dial from station to station to get music or talk they liked. Today, nearly all truckers have satellite, which is a perfect application of that technology. Local statins do not care a bit about losing out of town truckers or out of town anyone, as they do not help sell local advertising. Since when does the FCC adopt a standard that hands money to one particular patent holder? They did with C quam. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
M... IBOC should be good for XM and Sirius Sales ~ RHF
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|