Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Which raises questions about why, if HD is going to be the saviour of the AM band, there hasn't been as much promotion of HD on the low band as there has been on FM. The problem is that, with or without HD, there are only a couple of viable AMs per market, if you average the top 100 or so markets. Some have none, like DC. To the non-viable stations, HD is probably of no interest... brokerd shows, ethnic fringes and religion are the alternatives. Two additional questions: if 2.0 spec receivers are on their way to retail, how will we know them from the 1.x spec receivers, since retailers are going to be disinclined to identify obsoleted inventory themselves. There are only a couple of 1.0 radios out there... the infamous "disco lights" car radio and the BA and one or two others. They will probably be retired... I understand the BA was redesigned, using the new spec. What, specifically, are the differences, improvements, and advantages of 2.0 over the previous generation of HD radios? Lowered manufacturing cost is the main one, but there are some features related to the HD 2 selection and the data screen and sensitivity to the digital signal, as well as improvements to the basic algorithm on the receiver side. There is still not an efficient chipset that will allow portable devices that run on batteries. That is a major concern, but being worked on. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC at night and the local/regiona AMs | Shortwave | |||
IBOC at Night and the Local/Regional AMs | Shortwave | |||
IBOC at night and the local/regiona AMs | Shortwave | |||
IBOC -- a way to jam skywave signals from Mexico and Canada at night, just like the USSR did with VOA, RFE/RL, ... | Broadcasting | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting |