|
lazy ace
"dxAce" wrote in message ... Steve wrote: The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Digital=Death Don't worry, Edweenie will be around shortly to amuse us with even more astounding BS about HD/IBOC. We should have an indication today from the FCC about approving HD at night. |
lazy ace
David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill for Univision/iBiquity wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Steve wrote: The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Digital=Death Don't worry, Edweenie will be around shortly to amuse us with even more astounding BS about HD/IBOC. We should have an indication today from the FCC about approving HD at night. Yes indeed, oh fake one. And if they do, I hope it rains **** on you and yours every single day and night for the rest of your fake Hispanic lives. |
lazy ace
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill for Univision/iBiquity wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Pay? there is no fee. Buy the radio, no further fee. Get the radio, get far improved quality. I will bet you have not listened to HD AM either ever or recently, especially with codec ver. 2.2.5. I will bet that you've never pulled your head out of your ass long enough to discover that HD/IBOC = QRM We don't care. It is interference to signals that are not being used, vs. an opportunity to keep free terrestrial radio viable. |
lazy ace
David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill and prancer boy for Univision/iBiquity took it up the ass just before he wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill for Univision/iBiquity wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Pay? there is no fee. Buy the radio, no further fee. Get the radio, get far improved quality. I will bet you have not listened to HD AM either ever or recently, especially with codec ver. 2.2.5. I will bet that you've never pulled your head out of your ass long enough to discover that HD/IBOC = QRM We don't care. We know you don't. You've proven that time after time, 'tard boy. |
lazy ace
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill and prancer boy for Univision/iBiquity took it up the ass just before he wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill for Univision/iBiquity wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Pay? there is no fee. Buy the radio, no further fee. Get the radio, get far improved quality. I will bet you have not listened to HD AM either ever or recently, especially with codec ver. 2.2.5. I will bet that you've never pulled your head out of your ass long enough to discover that HD/IBOC = QRM We don't care. We know you don't. You've proven that time after time, 'tard boy. We care about the only listeners we truly have... local, in the local market area. |
lazy ace
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Pay? there is no fee. Buy the radio, no further fee. Get the radio, get far improved quality. I will bet you have not listened to HD AM either ever or recently, especially with codec ver. 2.2.5. No one will be attracted to it under any circumstances if its chief selling point is that it's "almost as good as the alternatives" FM HD is better than any other current distribution system, plus it is free. AM HD is as good as any alternative system, and is free. It is much better than Analog AM. |
lazy ace
David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill and prancer boy for Univision/iBiquity wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill and prancer boy for Univision/iBiquity took it up the ass just before he wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 and paid shill for Univision/iBiquity wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Pay? there is no fee. Buy the radio, no further fee. Get the radio, get far improved quality. I will bet you have not listened to HD AM either ever or recently, especially with codec ver. 2.2.5. I will bet that you've never pulled your head out of your ass long enough to discover that HD/IBOC = QRM We don't care. We know you don't. You've proven that time after time, 'tard boy. We care about the only listeners we truly have... local, in the local market area. Translation: You only care about what you're getting paid to do. |
lazy ace
Steve wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Pay? there is no fee. Buy the radio, no further fee. Get the radio, get far improved quality. I will bet you have not listened to HD AM either ever or recently, especially with codec ver. 2.2.5. No one will be attracted to it under any circumstances if its chief selling point is that it's "almost as good as the alternatives" One has to admit that Edweenie has a pretty good gig going he Actually getting paid to post on UseNet. |
lazy ace
Michael Lawson wrote: "David Eduardo" wrote in message om... "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Pay? there is no fee. Buy the radio, no further fee. Get the radio, get far improved quality. I will bet you have not listened to HD AM either ever or recently, especially with codec ver. 2.2.5. No one has yet given me an argument why I should replace the radios in my house with new radios to cover the exact same bands that I have now. While the receiver I have covers AM/FM bands, I rarely listen on it. Why? Not because of poor fidelity, but rather because I listen to radio I'm actively doing something: working, gardening, mowing the lawn, eating, washing dishes, driving, etc. When I turn on the receiver, it's because I'm going to watch a movie or something on the television that I want to hear in surround sound. Casual listening is the greatest benefit of radio, not the serious listening that HD AM/FM assumes. Yes, one must remember it's not about the serious listening that HD/IBOC assumes, but rather the serious money that Edweenie and his minions hope to make by selling an unsuspecting public something it doesn't really need. As always, follow the $$$ dxAce Michigan USA |
lazy ace
"Michael Lawson" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message om... "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... The digital alternative may well be the doom of AM radio. No one will pay to listen to a slightly inferior version of FM. Pay? there is no fee. Buy the radio, no further fee. Get the radio, get far improved quality. I will bet you have not listened to HD AM either ever or recently, especially with codec ver. 2.2.5. No one has yet given me an argument why I should replace the radios in my house with new radios to cover the exact same bands that I have now. You don't have to. All existing radios are backwards compatible. While the receiver I have covers AM/FM bands, I rarely listen on it. Why? Not because of poor fidelity, but rather because I listen to radio I'm actively doing something: working, gardening, mowing the lawn, eating, washing dishes, driving, etc. When I turn on the receiver, it's because I'm going to watch a movie or something on the television that I want to hear in surround sound. Casual listening is the greatest benefit of radio, not the serious listening that HD AM/FM assumes. The only difference is in the improved audio quality. There is no such thing as "serious" radio listening... it is almost all done to accompany other things, like working, driving, etc. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com