"In taking revenge, a man is but even with his enemy;
but in passing it over, he is superior."
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626); British philosopher and statesman.

Doesn't the Lord reserve exclusive right to vengeance?

& Big Foot was made in Gods Image..

A suitable response to 9-11 would not have included shipping the Bin
Laden family out of the country on September 13th.

- Then again, some would say a suitable response would be
to turn
the entire Middle East
into Glass...

David, You're probably an Allright Kind of guy..
BUt the **** you post ..

- Boggles the Mind . . .

I go for that,,, Turn the entire middle east into glass.I would start
with mecca.
cuhulin

"David" wrote in message
...
"In taking revenge, a man is but even with his enemy;
but in passing it over, he is superior."
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626); British philosopher and statesman.


That's a stupid philosophy and Sir Francis Crispy Bacon was obviously
snorting the same **** he was dusting his wig with.

B.H.

-=jd=- wrote:

On Fri 26 Aug 2005 02:48:10p, David wrote in message
:

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:42:35 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:



"David" wrote in message
. ..
"In taking revenge, a man is but even with his enemy;
but in passing it over, he is superior."
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626); British philosopher and statesman.

Yeah, we should have done nothing about 9/11.

Doesn't the Lord reserve exclusive right to vengeance?


Does he?

A suitable response to 9-11 would not have included shipping the Bin
Laden family out of the country on September 13th.


What did the Bin Laden family have to do with anything? Following your
demented line of reasoning here, are you saying we should place Timothy
McVeigh's extended family on death row for his crimes? How about Ted
Kaczynski's brother, should we just commit him to life in prision instead
of death, seeing as how he helped in the investigation? Though, to keep
*you* happy, we could still put the rest of Kaczynski's extended family on
death row.

We need to put the rest of Rickets family in the looney bin right along with
him!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Damn!!!....Steve posted and didn't say the word "TARD" ???


Is the world coming to an end? LOL!


"dxAce" wrote in message
...


-=jd=- wrote:

On Fri 26 Aug 2005 02:48:10p, David wrote in message
:

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:42:35 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:



"David" wrote in message
. ..
"In taking revenge, a man is but even with his enemy;
but in passing it over, he is superior."
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626); British philosopher and statesman.

Yeah, we should have done nothing about 9/11.

Doesn't the Lord reserve exclusive right to vengeance?


Does he?

A suitable response to 9-11 would not have included shipping the Bin
Laden family out of the country on September 13th.


What did the Bin Laden family have to do with anything? Following your
demented line of reasoning here, are you saying we should place Timothy
McVeigh's extended family on death row for his crimes? How about Ted
Kaczynski's brother, should we just commit him to life in prision
instead
of death, seeing as how he helped in the investigation? Though, to keep
*you* happy, we could still put the rest of Kaczynski's extended family
on
death row.

We need to put the rest of Rickets family in the looney bin right along
with
him!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Jack wrote:

Damn!!!....Steve posted and didn't say the word "TARD" ???

Is the world coming to an end? LOL!

I slipped up!

dxAce
Michigan
USA



"dxAce" wrote in message
...


-=jd=- wrote:

On Fri 26 Aug 2005 02:48:10p, David wrote in message
:

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:42:35 -0500, "MnMikew"
wrote:



"David" wrote in message
. ..
"In taking revenge, a man is but even with his enemy;
but in passing it over, he is superior."
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626); British philosopher and statesman.

Yeah, we should have done nothing about 9/11.

Doesn't the Lord reserve exclusive right to vengeance?


Does he?

A suitable response to 9-11 would not have included shipping the Bin
Laden family out of the country on September 13th.


What did the Bin Laden family have to do with anything? Following your
demented line of reasoning here, are you saying we should place Timothy
McVeigh's extended family on death row for his crimes? How about Ted
Kaczynski's brother, should we just commit him to life in prision
instead
of death, seeing as how he helped in the investigation? Though, to keep
*you* happy, we could still put the rest of Kaczynski's extended family
on
death row.

We need to put the rest of Rickets family in the looney bin right along
with
him!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Stop!,y'all are makeing me laugh to much!
cuhulin

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
8...
What did the Bin Laden family have to do with anything? Following your
demented line of reasoning here, are you saying we should place Timothy
McVeigh's extended family on death row for his crimes? How about Ted
Kaczynski's brother, should we just commit him to life in prision instead
of death, seeing as how he helped in the investigation? Though, to keep
*you* happy, we could still put the rest of Kaczynski's extended family on
death row.


Well, though I understand what you're getting at, you're argument here is
not sound. In the cases you refer to, no, the family members of these
individuals obviously should not be punished for the atrocities committed;
however, should they at the very least be questioned by authorities? I would
certainly ask no less.

/Just sayin'
//Not a crazy leftist

-Brian

y'all are makeing my litle doggy (she can read,she can speak my Larry
name too) scream and jump off of her couch.Lighten up,Please.
cuhulin