Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In an attmept to beat this subject to death, here are a few more links
to usefull information. One measure of the degree of isolation bewteen a feedline the outside is called "transfer impedance". From Fluke: http://www.flukenetworks.com/us/_Promotions/ISV/Glossary.htm "Transfer Impedance - For a specified cable length, transfer impedance relates to a current on one surface of a shield to the voltage drop generated by this current on the opposite surface of the shield. Transfer impedance is used to determine shield effectiveness against both ingress and egress of interfering signals. Shields with lower transfer impedance are more effective than shields with higher transfer impedance." Blue Jean Cables has a good simple article with chart. http://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/shielding.htm Beldon has more info at: http://www.belden-wire.com/Catalog/TechInfo/TechTransfer.htm One test I made was to use my antenna noise bridge with an additonal 4:1 step down transformer to induce noise in a wire that I ran parallel to my coax and triax feedlines. I compared several different types of coax. The crap they sell at Radio Shack is marginal. It is better then twisted or zip cord, but still sucks. For LF/MW/HF any of the real coax is very close in "leakage". I am partial to Belden but there are othre good brands. When I ran a 6' test "loop" in parallel, ~6" offset, with twisted or zip cord the induced/injected RF noise overwelamed evrything except for th e very strongest signals. With radio shack coax Ihad to place the test loop against the coax for significant ingress. With belden braid and foil coax I could barely detect the N, with Triax I couldn't detect it at all. I tend to think of video as mid level , LF/MW/HF receivers are low level and transmitters are high level. While similar, each level has different issues. For instance I might not mind lossing 5% of a 100W 40M transmitted signal, but I damn sure don't want that 5W to show up in my shack. A 10uV engress in video will not be detectable. A 10uV engress in to my LF/MW/SW, or even VHF/UHF will cover all but the strongest signals. Coax does not provide 100% isolation, so I take some pains to keep the transmitt coax lines seprated from the receive coax lines and to insure they don't run parallel for any significant length. And spiral wraped shielded cable is about the worst choice you can make for either video or RF. For very short video or audio runs, up to 1m, spiral might work IF there are no RFI sources nearby. Spiral cables are cheap and every VCR/DVD that I have seen comes with these cheapies.These should NEVER be used for even short connections to a SW! An example: I have a RF patch bay and one night theAC mains went down. I was in mid rebuild so I wanted to patch my DX398 into my patch bay. I had just installed a high end DVD and still had the cables in my garbage can. I grabbed the video (yellow RCA) a patch to BNC, RCA to BNC, and a RCA to 3.5MM. I was amazed at how much RFI from laptop was getting in to the DX398. So I dug out the correct patch cable, a 1M RG174 BNC to 3.5MM and when I switched cables the RFI vanished. In disgust I cut the cables in half and put them back in the trash. http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/audioprinciples/interconnects/spiral_shield_cables.php Terry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Information Bulletin | Policy | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
OLD motorola trunking information | Scanner |