Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I'll admit it.
I don't know what people are talking about when they say the E1 doesn't have an AM antenna. Doesn't it have a whip antenna. What more could you want? What the heck is a "ferrite rod antenna" anyway? And what does it do differently than the whip? Thanks all. Lenny |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Lenny" wrote: OK, I'll admit it. I don't know what people are talking about when they say the E1 doesn't have an AM antenna. People have stated that the E1 does not have an internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. Doesn't it have a whip antenna. Yes. What more could you want? An internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. What the heck is a "ferrite rod antenna" anyway? It's a closed loop type antenna utilizing a high permeance core (the ferrite) in order to take up less space. And what does it do differently than the whip? 1. More convenient to use as you don't have to have the long whip sticking out when you carry it around. 2. The whip is omnidirectional and the loop ferrite rod antenna has two nulls in the pattern that you could use to null out a competing station of local noise source, which could improve your reception. 3. The ferrite loop is less susceptible to pick up local noise sources being sensitive to the magnetic field component whereas the whip is sensitive to the electric field. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Telamon.
Lenny "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Lenny" wrote: OK, I'll admit it. I don't know what people are talking about when they say the E1 doesn't have an AM antenna. People have stated that the E1 does not have an internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. Doesn't it have a whip antenna. Yes. What more could you want? An internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. What the heck is a "ferrite rod antenna" anyway? It's a closed loop type antenna utilizing a high permeance core (the ferrite) in order to take up less space. And what does it do differently than the whip? 1. More convenient to use as you don't have to have the long whip sticking out when you carry it around. 2. The whip is omnidirectional and the loop ferrite rod antenna has two nulls in the pattern that you could use to null out a competing station of local noise source, which could improve your reception. 3. The ferrite loop is less susceptible to pick up local noise sources being sensitive to the magnetic field component whereas the whip is sensitive to the electric field. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Lenny" wrote: Thanks Telamon. Lenny "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Lenny" wrote: OK, I'll admit it. I don't know what people are talking about when they say the E1 doesn't have an AM antenna. People have stated that the E1 does not have an internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. Doesn't it have a whip antenna. Yes. What more could you want? An internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. What the heck is a "ferrite rod antenna" anyway? It's a closed loop type antenna utilizing a high permeance core (the ferrite) in order to take up less space. And what does it do differently than the whip? 1. More convenient to use as you don't have to have the long whip sticking out when you carry it around. 2. The whip is omnidirectional and the loop ferrite rod antenna has two nulls in the pattern that you could use to null out a competing station of local noise source, which could improve your reception. 3. The ferrite loop is less susceptible to pick up local noise sources being sensitive to the magnetic field component whereas the whip is sensitive to the electric field. No problem Lenny. #2 Should have been "competing station or local noise source." I need a Usenet editor. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Telamon wrote: In article , "Lenny" wrote: Thanks Telamon. Lenny "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Lenny" wrote: OK, I'll admit it. I don't know what people are talking about when they say the E1 doesn't have an AM antenna. People have stated that the E1 does not have an internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. Doesn't it have a whip antenna. Yes. What more could you want? An internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. What the heck is a "ferrite rod antenna" anyway? It's a closed loop type antenna utilizing a high permeance core (the ferrite) in order to take up less space. And what does it do differently than the whip? 1. More convenient to use as you don't have to have the long whip sticking out when you carry it around. 2. The whip is omnidirectional and the loop ferrite rod antenna has two nulls in the pattern that you could use to null out a competing station of local noise source, which could improve your reception. 3. The ferrite loop is less susceptible to pick up local noise sources being sensitive to the magnetic field component whereas the whip is sensitive to the electric field. No problem Lenny. #2 Should have been "competing station or local noise source." I need a Usenet editor. -- Telamon Ventura, California The lack of a ferrite antenna in the E1 is a deal-breaker for me. Monitoring Times reported that the dot matrix display generated too much noise and made the implementation of a ferrite antenna impractical. I'm hoping a future revision of the receiver might include a ferrite rod. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike0219116 wrote:
The lack of a ferrite antenna in the E1 is a deal-breaker for me. Monitoring Times reported that the dot matrix display generated too much noise and made the implementation of a ferrite antenna impractical. I'm hoping a future revision of the receiver might include a ferrite rod. There should be some way of wiring up a ferrite core antenna in an exterior box. The thing could be rotated easily and kept a few feet away from the display. A bit of wiring to the external antenna connection and you've got everything. http://user.netonecom.net/~swordman/...op-article.htm or: http://snipurl.com/m07n mike |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"mike0219116" wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "Lenny" wrote: Thanks Telamon. Lenny "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Lenny" wrote: OK, I'll admit it. I don't know what people are talking about when they say the E1 doesn't have an AM antenna. People have stated that the E1 does not have an internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. Doesn't it have a whip antenna. Yes. What more could you want? An internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. What the heck is a "ferrite rod antenna" anyway? It's a closed loop type antenna utilizing a high permeance core (the ferrite) in order to take up less space. And what does it do differently than the whip? 1. More convenient to use as you don't have to have the long whip sticking out when you carry it around. 2. The whip is omnidirectional and the loop ferrite rod antenna has two nulls in the pattern that you could use to null out a competing station of local noise source, which could improve your reception. 3. The ferrite loop is less susceptible to pick up local noise sources being sensitive to the magnetic field component whereas the whip is sensitive to the electric field. No problem Lenny. #2 Should have been "competing station or local noise source." I need a Usenet editor. -- Telamon Ventura, California The lack of a ferrite antenna in the E1 is a deal-breaker for me. Monitoring Times reported that the dot matrix display generated too much noise and made the implementation of a ferrite antenna impractical. I'm hoping a future revision of the receiver might include a ferrite rod. The radio has an external antenna jack that you could use to connect a small amplified loop antenna. Located a few feet away from the E1 so it does not pick up the display noise you could point the loop by hand and I would like that better than having to turn the radio itself in a certain direction to null out a competing on-channel station or local noise source. It's more more money and trouble though. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah well, if Eton hadn't pushed this receiver into the marketplace at
such manic, breakneck speed, then maybe they'd have had time to include a ferrite antenna and make the display quieter. Better to take your time and do it right than launch a product prematurely--even if it means missing a deadline or two. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, how exactly do you use the nulls?
Does the ferrite rod move around inside the radio with a control? Lenny "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Lenny" wrote: Thanks Telamon. Lenny "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "Lenny" wrote: OK, I'll admit it. I don't know what people are talking about when they say the E1 doesn't have an AM antenna. People have stated that the E1 does not have an internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. Doesn't it have a whip antenna. Yes. What more could you want? An internal "ferrite rod" antenna inside. What the heck is a "ferrite rod antenna" anyway? It's a closed loop type antenna utilizing a high permeance core (the ferrite) in order to take up less space. And what does it do differently than the whip? 1. More convenient to use as you don't have to have the long whip sticking out when you carry it around. 2. The whip is omnidirectional and the loop ferrite rod antenna has two nulls in the pattern that you could use to null out a competing station of local noise source, which could improve your reception. 3. The ferrite loop is less susceptible to pick up local noise sources being sensitive to the magnetic field component whereas the whip is sensitive to the electric field. No problem Lenny. #2 Should have been "competing station or local noise source." I need a Usenet editor. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lenny wrote: So, how exactly do you use the nulls? Does the ferrite rod move around inside the radio with a control? One merely moves the radio. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|