Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Slow Code wrote: wrote in ps.com: Slow Code wrote: Improving your skills doesn't make you a better operator? Sheeesh. Mike, skill. Singular. There is no skill test for any other mode. You can still have your microphone, but you should have to pass a code test before you're allowed to use it. I like 5 WPM for Tech, 13 for General, and 20wpm for Extra, but then, I'm not lazy. SC You may not be lazy, but you're fully prepared to kill off amateur radio with archaic requirements. I guess if you can't have the amateur radio the way you want it, to hell with it all. We have to dumb it down to keep it from dying? SC We have to remove unnecessary and superfluous licensing requirements. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
Slow Code wrote: I expect you'll say the same thing about the written exam in ten years too. SC Not me. Jim/N2EY is the one who trotted out that strawman. I guess if he can't have amateur radio the way he wants it, he'll make sure it becomes a non-technical hobby. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GRAYLAND 2004 FALL DXPEDITION: Compiled Logs for Oct 15-17 (Part 1) | Shortwave | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Radio and Electronics | Shortwave |