| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
November 16th 06, 02:00 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
A non renewable no-code license is a good idea.
It's irrelevant. The code requirement is going away soon. Then what will
you bitch about? "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... It provides an incentive to keeping studying and building radio skills so you can graduate to a more permanent higher class license. Those that fail to upgrade, no loss, we don't need them anyway. We want quality operators. If you want quantity, go to CB. SC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
| What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? | Policy | |||
| What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? | General | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Threaded Mode
