| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
February 4th 04, 09:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: Do not the regs state maximum allowable bandwidth? No! -- I would say yes, and no... there don't seem to be strict limits, but Part 97 does state: §97.307 Emission standards. (a) No amateur station transmission shall occupy more bandwidth than necessary for the information rate and emission type being transmitted, in accordance with good amateur practice. (b) Emissions resulting from modulation must be confined to the band or segment available to the control operator. Emissions outside the necessary bandwidth must not cause splatter or keyclick interference to operations on adjacent frequencies. |
|
#2
February 4th 04, 10:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Brenda Ann" wrote: wrote in message ... In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: Do not the regs state maximum allowable bandwidth? No! -- I would say yes, and no... there don't seem to be strict limits, but Part 97 does state: §97.307 Emission standards. (a) No amateur station transmission shall occupy more bandwidth than necessary for the information rate and emission type being transmitted, in accordance with good amateur practice. (b) Emissions resulting from modulation must be confined to the band or segment available to the control operator. Emissions outside the necessary bandwidth must not cause splatter or keyclick interference to operations on adjacent frequencies. Yes Brenda we've hashed this out over and over again, like deja vu all over again. There was a petition to make the changes in FCC regulations and specify bandwidth, but the FCC has not acted on it. It's a old old argument that a few "hams" have taken up because of a few other "hams" are doing somthing that these other "hams" don't like. It's another battle of the titans......I wanna be more powerful than you....... Personally I don't give a rip. The so called "hi-fi" folks bother me far far less than contesters, in fact they don't bother me at all. There are many more important issues and problems in ham radio today than this old fight. I might add that there does appear to be some personal vendettas ongoing in this whole thing which makes it even more flawed. We've heard the experts explain on the air and in comments at length all about bandwidth and how much should be taken up by ssb and why ect ect.....while all that is going on I get on 75 meter phone at night and I hear AM every 10 kc up and down the band taking up 10 kc and more per transmitter and no one seems concerned about that bandwidth and I'm not against AM mind you, I happen to think it's a rich part of ham radio and the folks that are engaged in this part of ham radio should be able to operate without harrasment from others too. I also believe that if we can make room for AM we should be able to make room for this hi fi segment of the ham population. For a few stations and I do mean a few that explore this little facet of the radio hobby there is so much controversy, my heavens don't we have more to think about? I'll go back in my hole now. 73 Dale, K9VUJ -- |
|
#3
February 4th 04, 10:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
February 5th 04, 01:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
W6DKN wrote:
The key concepts here are "in accordance with good amateur practice", Unfortunately too many hams today haven't a clue as to what "good amateur radio practice" is. |
|
#6
February 4th 04, 09:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... Do not the regs state maximum allowable bandwidth? Here in Canada....6 KHz See: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric2.PDF/$FILE/r ic2.PDF |
|
#7
February 4th 04, 09:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"M.D." wrote in message . .. "Brenda Ann" wrote in message ... Do not the regs state maximum allowable bandwidth? Here in Canada....6 KHz See: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric2.PDF/$FILE/r ic2.PDF My my... you folks have some broadcast quality authorizations in the 220 band... |
|
#8
February 6th 04, 03:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No it does not. FCC is afraid to commit to a bandwidth law.
Butch KF5DE Brenda Ann wrote: Do not the regs state maximum allowable bandwidth? |
|
#9
February 5th 04, 01:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
M.D. wrote:
"Marty B." wrote in message ... If you been on the HF bands for at least a Decade you will remember the term "Lid" . Now a new Term has arise, the Guy who is wide using the Wider Bandwidth for audio is now called "BAND-HOGS" just a step above the classification of the "Lid" BAND-HOG is a guy who needs more than 3 kc to transmit in SSB and thinking just of himself, and poor operating practice. Hey Marty, I paid for the equipment, I choose to use it any damn way I want. Typical cber attitude. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 1930's Futuristic Wood Radio has been called the "Searchlight radio" by some | Boatanchors | |||
| Once upon a time in America there came to be a giant of an organization called the American Radio Relay League (ARRL). | General | |||
| Once upon a time in America there came to be a giant of an organization called the American Radio Relay League (ARRL). | Policy | |||
| That QRM called CW | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
