Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"clfe" wrote in
: "L. M. Rappaport" wrote in message ... On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:21:48 GMT, Slow Code wrote (with possible editing): Phony's can ignore. This question doesn't apply to no-codes. Nickle Generals and Extras: If the 13 and 20 wpm CW exams came back and you had to pass the proper code exam for your class to renew, 13 wpm for general, 20 wpm for extra, would you renew your license? Yes, I would. I admit it would take a bit of practice to get back to 20 wpm, but I would do it. -- 73, Larry W1HJF rapp at lmr dot com Ya know what they say, if ya don't use it - ya lose it. We seem to lose track of more than code. Many lose track of some of the theory, formulas and so on they've learned to get their license. There are times you don't seem to need it, but just when you do - you stumble for it. It is best to "try" to stay as active as you can in some aspect of radio. It is a shame to study, test, get your license only to let it all be for naught. Even by going through the news groups and reading the "tech" aspects of repairing and so on, you can at least keep that part of it alive. Just my 2 cents. Lou - KA3FLU That is why I have always proposed that licenses shouldn't be automatically renewable. When a license expires or is just about to expire the ham must retake and pass all exam elements required for that license class before it can be renewed again. 99% of the hams on usenet hate my proposal. They think you shouldn't have to be proficient at anything to have a ham radio license. I think the reason all this came about was after ham radio was dumbed down by restructuring alot of CB'ers were able to get licensed and oppose anything that might required you work to be proficient and valuable asset to the service. SC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|