Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
Can't you see that the first resonance corresponds to the parallel resonance of the inductance with its stray capacitance, and is what you call its 1/2-wave resonance? It may just be semantics. I call the first parallel self- resonant point the *1/4WL* self-resonant point. At its self- resonant frequency, a mobile loading coil is 1/4WL long. I am using that same convention for the coax choke. For instance, my 75m bugcatcher mobile loading coil is self-resonant at ~6.6 MHz. That's the frequency at which it is 1/4 wavelength long and presents a high impedance. At some higher frequency, it is 1/2WL long and presents a low impedance. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bindy wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Based on some calculations I did today, I am offering an original rule of thumb (as far as I know). Regarding a coax choke, when deciding how many turns of coax to put on a 2 liter pop bottle at two turns per inch, one needs to avoid the self-resonant frequency. So don't put more turns on the choke than the number of meters in a wavelength, e.g. no more than 20 turns on 20m, no more than 6 turns on 6m. Backup calculations will be published on my web page. 20 Turns is way too much for 20 through to 10. I didn't say anything about "20 through to 10". Here's what my rule of thumb says: No more than 20 turns on 20m, no more than 10 turns on 10m, and no more than 6 turns on 6m. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Will wrote:
That is neet. Now I just got to figure a choke of RG8X at 146mhz to keep the RF from comming back down the outside of the coax cable from the J pole. My rule of thumb is for RG-213 wrapped around a 4" dia. 2L pop bottle and thus applies mostly to HF. Using a 2" dia. coil form (pill bottle) with RG8X, my EXCEL program says 2-3 turns is about right for 2m. What about ferrite beads/chokes over the coax instead of the coil of coax cable? That works. Just make sure the ferrite is functional at 146 MHz, maybe #67 material. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . .. Bindy wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Based on some calculations I did today, I am offering an original rule of thumb (as far as I know). Regarding a coax choke, when deciding how many turns of coax to put on a 2 liter pop bottle at two turns per inch, one needs to avoid the self-resonant frequency. So don't put more turns on the choke than the number of meters in a wavelength, e.g. no more than 20 turns on 20m, no more than 6 turns on 6m. Backup calculations will be published on my web page. 20 Turns is way too much for 20 through to 10. I didn't say anything about "20 through to 10". Here's what my rule of thumb says: No more than 20 turns on 20m, no more than 10 turns on 10m, and no more than 6 turns on 6m. ====================================== Cec, Does all the above apply to the diameter of a pop bottle? And what is the diameter over the plastic jacket of the coax? The length of the coil will be N times the jacket diameter, assuming the N turns are close-spaced. Don't forget, mean coil diameter will be pop bottle diameter plus coax jacket diameter. It does make a difference. ----- Reg. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
Does all the above apply to the diameter of a pop bottle? Yes 4" dia. and 2 turns per inch using RG-213. And what is the diameter over the plastic jacket of the coax? 0.405" for RG-213, approximately 1/2". The length of the coil will be N times the jacket diameter, assuming the N turns are close-spaced. Yes, that's why there are 2 turns per inch for RG-213. Don't forget, mean coil diameter will be pop bottle diameter plus coax jacket diameter. It does make a difference. Maybe a 10-20% difference. Doesn't make much difference to a rule of thumb. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Will" wrote in message oups.com... That is neet. Now I just got to figure a choke of RG8X at 146mhz to keep the RF from comming back down the outside of the coax cable from the J pole. The VSWR is realy good at 1:1.1, and it talks realy well. What about ferrite beads/chokes over the coax instead of the coil of coax cable? Hi Will I have been using some affordable ferrites for "keeping the RF from the outside of the coax" at about 2 meters. All my crude measurements indicate that the Very affordable ferrite tubes from All Electronics http://www.allelectronics.com/ work OK. I figured the tubes were intended to keep RFI from conducting down the cables inside the *All ferrite tubes*, so I tried them, and they work for me. They have some snap-on models that might have an ID big enough to fit over your RG8X. Jerry |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cec,
Let us know when your rule-of-thumb is available from your website. I'm looking forward to seeing the details. I guess there will be the usual collection of over-meticulous nit-pickers. ---- Reg. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
Let us know when your rule-of-thumb is available from your website. I'm looking forward to seeing the details. It's at http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/Corum1.xls Can you run EXCEL, Reg, or do you need it in a different form? -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cec, I can't run Excel.
I need something which will run just by clicking on it. ---- Reg. ============================== "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Reg Edwards wrote: Let us know when your rule-of-thumb is available from your website. I'm looking forward to seeing the details. It's at http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/Corum1.xls Can you run EXCEL, Reg, or do you need it in a different form? -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Will wrote:
That is neet. Now I just got to figure a choke of RG8X at 146mhz to keep the RF from comming back down the outside of the coax cable from the J pole. The VSWR is realy good at 1:1.1, and it talks realy well. What about ferrite beads/chokes over the coax instead of the coil of coax cable? Digikey carries a pretty broad line of Steward long form ferrite bead cores. You can check the specifications at http://www.steward.com/ For instance, core HFB143064-300 has an impedance of about 180 ohms at 146 MHz. Type HF is their highest frequency material. Core 28B0562-200 (same size in the lower frequency, 28 material) produces an impedance of about 360 ohms per core. I think both of these would fit over RG8X and are about an inch and an eighth long. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC WRC-03 Amateur Rule Changes Now in Effect | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
The Pickett N-16 ES Slide Rule | Homebrew | |||
FS: Palomar 225 | CB | |||
I also need Diy plans for a 300 watt linear | CB |