Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can find quite a bit of discussion about small loops if you search
the archives of this group. That, however, may confuse you because some folk seem intent on making absolute statements about things they don't really understand. Reputable books will tell you that the "shield" is actually the antenna, and to gain the advantage of rejection of local predominantly e-field noise, you must make the loop very symmetrical. I know that Jasick's Antenna Engineering book has a good chapter on loops, and King, Mimno and Wing's "Transmission Lines, Antennas and Waveguides" has a good qualitative discussion of them. There are various programs out there to help you determine the performance of small receiving loops. I've found one on Reg Edwards' web page to be useful. Cheers, Tom John wrote: Hello all, I am new to the group and have a question. Does anyone know a good source of information on small (less than .1wl), shielded (coax) magnetic loops? In particular, I would like to know design equations (are ON4UN's formulae correct and complete?). Why do most people use RG-59 rather than a thicker coax (shielding, C/ft?)? Why is 20' for 160 meters the norm? Discarding mechanical considerations, wouldn't thicker coax provide greater efficiency? I found ON4UN's book lacking on this antenna. Thanks in advance, John, N9RF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le 12 Aug 2006 14:59:50 -0700,
"K7ITM" a écrit : You can find quite a bit of discussion about small loops if you search the archives of this group. That, however, may confuse you because some folk seem intent on making absolute statements about things they don't really understand. Reputable books will tell you that the "shield" is actually the antenna, and to gain the advantage of rejection of local predominantly e-field noise, you must make the loop very symmetrical. I know that Jasick's Antenna Engineering book has a good chapter on loops, and King, Mimno and Wing's "Transmission Lines, Antennas and Waveguides" has a good qualitative discussion of them. There are various programs out there to help you determine the performance of small receiving loops. I've found one on Reg Edwards' web page to be useful. Cheers, Tom The Balanis have an extended chapter on loops, but nothing on shielded loop. But it is a very interesting reading in all cases, as well as other books too. John wrote: Hello all, I am new to the group and have a question. Does anyone know a good source of information on small (less than .1wl), shielded (coax) magnetic loops? In particular, I would like to know design equations (are ON4UN's formulae correct and complete?). Why do most people use RG-59 rather than a thicker coax (shielding, C/ft?)? Why is 20' for 160 meters the norm? Discarding mechanical considerations, wouldn't thicker coax provide greater efficiency? I think at it is because RG-59 is cheaper. The parasitic capacitance don't have a big impact on a small loop because you will have to use an additional capacitor to get the antenna to resonate on the frequency you want to receive. Cheers, Dominique I found ON4UN's book lacking on this antenna. Thanks in advance, John, N9RF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AM/MW Loop Antenna - Inductive Coupling -vice- Resistor Spoiler | Shortwave | |||
Building a 'simple' Attic Loop Antenna = Not So Simple ! | Shortwave | |||
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question | Shortwave | |||
160 Meter Band Balanced Coaxial Receiving Loop Antrenna by KN4LF | Shortwave |