Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any attempt to improve on a working antenna situation has generally made it
worse. "Bob Miller" wrote in message ... On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:19:01 -0600, Cecil Moore wrote: Bob Miller wrote: Thanks, Cecil. That's a good excuse to just go ahead and shorten my balun connections. But Bob, how do you know those impedance transformations are not beneficial to your matching process? :-) Dammit, Cecil, I don't know :-( So, I'll keep what I have in place (it actually works fine), but build an alternative balun. See what happens. Bob k5qwg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
G5RV junior question | Antenna | |||
Seperation question???? thanks | Antenna | |||
Yagi / Beam antenna theory question... | Antenna | |||
Question about attenuators ... | Antenna | |||
G5RV 450 ohm or 300 ohm Phasing line | Antenna |