| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 08:02:14 GMT, "Alan" wrote:
I guessed they might be but does anybody use a smaller antenna as a compromise? Hi Alan, Sure. So's the signal (a compromise). When you get into fractional wavelength sizes (and we're talking on the order of less than 5% of wavelength), you quickly get into fractional performance. It has to do with the comparison of the radiation resistance which at 5% is 2 Ohms. This is 25:1 mismatch, and the matching components are going to have to present less than 2 Ohms in themselves (not forgetting all the connections that support the circulating currents) just to limit your loss to 3dB. If it were easy, few shootout contestants would be running 10dB below the winners. Still and all, even if your 100W signal ends up radiating 10W, lots of folks have worked the world with less. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| I Want Another Antenna | Shortwave | |||
| The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
| Mobile 2m/70cm antenna | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||