Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dear rich:
Hi , thanks for the reply. the device i saw sure was a switcher"" i agree analog yuck my goal wasn't so much strictly max power per say but to keep power constant, so if my , on batt power had to be 75w vs 100w i could live w/that but as the bat voltage droped so would my 'power' etc and perhaps add a little ''unpredictability'' kinda my presumption was the regulators would be at least 86% efficient,(manuf spec's) while not great i figured if i simply got more batteries as soon as i put load past a certain run time volts would sag w/o a reg so the question sorta became do i add more battery to compensaate for the loss of 'regulator' to get the time i need or simply just pile up the batteries right now i figured 4--8d sized gell would do the trick w/a little help from a regulator whcih do you think is most efficent? In article , Richard Clark wrote: On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:34:55 GMT, ml wrote: hi kinda recently i stumbled onto a web site or article (ad) from someone that was making a 12v regulator that took 12v from batteries to supply your rig w/a more stable voltage I lost that link and can't seem to find it or google it Hi Myles, That may be a blessing in disguise. A linear regulator will always exhibit a lower voltage out than the voltage in. If you have 12V in, you cannot have 12V out. It would have to be less. An expensive one might offer a drop of tenths of a volt (11.6V to 11.9V out from 12.0V in), but this depends on the current draw. Most Ham equipment is not rated at 12V, but rather at 13.6V which is the potential of fully charged batteries (2.25V per cell). The "12V regulator" you were considering could easily drop the difference (1.6V) in an effort to maintain a constant 12V. This is not a boon to maximizing output power if that is your goal. A switcher style regulator can be more efficient, but it will cost much more too. Switchers can take a considerable range of input voltages and supply a fairly consistent voltage at many loads. There are switchers that can supply MORE voltage than what is applied to their inputs, but at a cost of demanding MORE current from that source. Think of switchers as a see-saw that exhibit a constant of proportionality in power (less some loss). For instance, if you needed 12V @ 20A, your switcher could convert it from 6V @ 40A, or it could convert it from 24V @ 5A. [Actually, no one switcher design could accommodate such a wide range with equal efficiency, but there are designs tailored to either situation.] However, if you demand too much current from your source, then no regulator is going to supply it and regulation is going to fail. Often, the best use of regulation is to keep circuits from going haywire if the voltage droops excessively during transmission. Unfortunately, during transmission, this is a condition of maximum current demand. Basically, if your voltage droops too much, the battery is either shot (bad cell) or under capacity. Get a new battery, or get a battery with more A/H capacity. This alone could make up the need for "regulation." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
R-390A: feeding oscillator tube heaters in DC, w/o regulator tube? | Boatanchors | |||
'Radio Spares' High Power Voltage Regulator spec ? | Homebrew | |||
WTD--Source for LM325H or SG2501 dual voltage regulator IC | Homebrew | |||
Voltage Regulator Question | Boatanchors | |||
FS: GE MASTR II 10-Volt Regulator Card | Swap |