Cecil wrote,

Tdonaly wrote:
(P.S. Art, I hope you don't equate disagreement with ridicule. I reserve
all my
ridicule for Cecil since he can take it.)

.... .. .... ..

Tom, I notice you have not posted your calculations for
the phase angles of those superposed phasors I presented
yesterday. Did you come up with any phase angle other
than zero and 180 degrees? Do you understand why Kraus'
phase graph for standing wave current contains only two
possible values of phase?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP




What! And get into a 500 post exchange with you? You must think I'm
mad.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Tdonaly wrote:

Cecil wrote,
Tom, I notice you have not posted your calculations for
the phase angles of those superposed phasors I presented
yesterday. Did you come up with any phase angle other
than zero and 180 degrees? Do you understand why Kraus'
phase graph for standing wave current contains only two
possible values of phase?

What! And get into a 500 post exchange with you? You must think I'm
mad.

Heh, heh, it won't be a 500 post exchange if you got the same answer
as Kraus and I did (50 years ago). :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----