Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have used an SGC 230 to tune a eandom long wire with great results
but it died and I installed a 4:1 balun and now us the internal 50 ohm tuner in my Icom IC 746. It tunes the long wire the same but is it as efficient as the SGC? I plan on putting up a flagpole antennae and want to use the 4:1 balun, one side to the ground radials and the other to the flagpole. Appreiate any advice in this project. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Va3mrj" wrote in message ps.com... I have used an SGC 230 to tune a eandom long wire with great results but it died and I installed a 4:1 balun and now us the internal 50 ohm tuner in my Icom IC 746. It tunes the long wire the same but is it as efficient as the SGC? I plan on putting up a flagpole antennae and want to use the 4:1 balun, one side to the ground radials and the other to the flagpole. Appreiate any advice in this project. Not meaning to give a short answer, but no "tuner" is 'efficient'. Of you may already know that ![]() more "efficient" simply because of larger inductors and more capacity; sometimes, bigger IS better! ![]() efficient than a hamstick! Perhaps, someone else has more...........................? Good luck. Jerry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|