Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:19:44 +0000, Wayne wrote:
We simply used the commercially available B&W broadband loaded dipole. Our customer typically ran 1KW into the antenna, and was very happy with the price/performance. In spite of the negatives often cited about the antenna, it is a very effective compromise for some situations. The other reason I don't necessarily want to use the B&W is that with a little freedom of design parameters and my limited frequency range of interest (don't need 1.8 to 30 or even 4 to 30, just need 4 to 9), I was hoping I could adjust the design characteristics to minimize the inefficiency and mitigate the negatives. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Starting point for antenna design | Antenna | |||
Eton Porsche Design P7131 Questions | Shortwave | |||
The main problem with Ham radio... | Policy | |||
BiQuad Design Specifications for Microwave? | Antenna | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |