|
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com