| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#51
February 4th 09, 12:35 AM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
|
#52
February 7th 09, 12:32 AM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
|
#53
February 7th 09, 08:37 PM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
|
#54
February 9th 09, 06:54 PM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
an ontopic post about code
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS |
|
#55
February 10th 09, 03:14 PM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
an ontopic post about code
|
|
#57
February 11th 09, 01:13 AM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
an ontopic post about code
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:52:18 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:14:10 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS Are you about done spamming this stuff? Can we please get back to the discussions that these news groups were designed for? Please? Ron id love to but sme folks just will not alow not my fault and thye need tohe reminder I suppose in English that means "No". it means ask someone else If the original post of mine was not to you then why did you answer? Do you know the name you post under? Most of have no need of a reminder, thanks. Maybe you feel the need to remind others, and now that you have done so please refrain from further spam. well again that depend on other when they make it clear they don't get then they will reminded yes along with yourself and other sadly that is the way the usenet works Again, your use of the English language is a bit ... vague. indeed as certain of those that seem to need reminders are the subjects of FCC enforcement actions I help to generate I sadly expect that they will ned more remidners in the near future but that is up to them Ron You you feel that you are the one, the best qualified, to provide these "reminders"? With the sad state of your command of the English language I'd suspect any claim that you generated an FCC action. Kindly allow the individual to whom I posted the original "post" to answer. If he can that is. Somehow I doubt that anything beyond spam is a reach for him. Ron |
|
#58
February 11th 09, 10:33 PM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
an ontopic post about code
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:13:35 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:52:18 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:14:10 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS Are you about done spamming this stuff? Can we please get back to the discussions that these news groups were designed for? Please? Ron id love to but sme folks just will not alow not my fault and thye need tohe reminder I suppose in English that means "No". it means ask someone else If the original post of mine was not to you then why did you answer? Do you know the name you post under? it seemed to be me I am telling it iswas msiderected By whom? It sure seems to me that the post I replied to is in this very thread, maybe it was your reply that was misdirected to this one rather than the one you had intended. Most of have no need of a reminder, thanks. Maybe you feel the need to remind others, and now that you have done so please refrain from further spam. well again that depend on other when they make it clear they don't get then they will reminded yes along with yourself and other sadly that is the way the usenet works Again, your use of the English language is a bit ... vague. hardly vauge at all I assume that English is your primary language, right? Does your news reader have a spelling checker on/in it? Have you ever used such a subprogram? If not I'd like to suggest that you become familiar with its use. Your spelling is absolutely atrocious, your syntax is worse, and this combines to make your posts nearly unreadable. Its not really a difficult concept to grasp, and the program is quite intuitive. Its built for those who cannot spell, in other words for someone just like yourself (and I to be honest, but I have learned to use my spell-checkers). it seems and to the point if other parties would demostrate they finaly understand then then a repeat will not be needed Same at ya big guy. based on past performance I don't even if they understand that it will last at all indeed as certain of those that seem to need reminders are the subjects of FCC enforcement actions I help to generate I sadly expect that they will ned more remidners in the near future but that is up to them Ron You you feel that you are the one, the best qualified, to provide these "reminders"? aboslotely How so? Are you the worlds foremost user of code? If so then I dearly hope you spell better in code than you do here. Imagine the bad name you give to other HAM's with your spelling. indeed as the targt of the remarks that indicate the need for a reminder I am thealmost the only one in the world able to ntice With the sad state of your command of the English language I'd suspect any claim that you generated an FCC action. ah now you are just being insultingand foolish Honest, not insulting. Please, review your posts to me in this thread. Read them one word at a time and then get back to me. Can you honestly say that they make sense? That the spelling is above par for an individual who's primary language is reported to be English? Kindly allow the individual to whom I posted the original "post" to answer. alow myself to post? how could I stopp anyone form posting indeed If I had that power I would used it and if I had the power to stop someone from posting no one would need remeinding Actually, unless you use more than one name/account to post with, the original individual I was posting to goes by the name of ". The current account you are posting from is ". Significant difference there, don't you think? Assuming that your account name here corresponds to a HAM call, then it would be even more simple to assume that anyone named Brian, residing in Florida, speaks English as his first language. If he can that is. Somehow I doubt that anything beyond spam is a reach for him. HUH? I'd explain it, but I don't think I could keep the words small enough for you. Ron |
|
#59
February 13th 09, 11:03 PM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
an ontopic post about code
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:33:38 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:13:35 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:52:18 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:14:10 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:36:47 -0800, John Smith wrote: K4YZ wrote: Nope. The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Sounds like Lennie, to me.... Steve, K4YZ To anyone with even an elementary understanding of anonymous proxies, anonymous remailers, zombie backdoors, etc., the ability to change ones IP address and header details is simplistic, indeed, with little time spent anyone can appear to be "coming" from anywhere in the world. You waste my time. Worse, you think us all idiots here. You remind me of the "street smart" prosecutors and defense attorneys who stack jurys with members of little or no technical knowledge and then call in "expert witnesses" and propose arguments of technical details to boggle their minds. You have only proven that you, yourself are either ignorant to such technical details, or else you are indeed street smart, I favor the latter in this case (however, if you in the dark about such things, 15 minutes on google will enlighten you.) JS Are you about done spamming this stuff? Can we please get back to the discussions that these news groups were designed for? Please? Ron id love to but sme folks just will not alow not my fault and thye need tohe reminder I suppose in English that means "No". it means ask someone else If the original post of mine was not to you then why did you answer? Do you know the name you post under? it seemed to be me I am telling it iswas msiderected By whom? you Not I bub. I replied, and have no ability to redirect your posts. If it was redirected, then we the clear thinking members of the news group can only come to one conclusion. It sure seems to me that the post I replied to is in this very thread, maybe it was your reply that was misdirected to this one rather than the one you had intended. may seem that way to you And just about anyone else who reads these news groups. Odd that you are the only one who might think differently isn't it? Most of have no need of a reminder, thanks. Maybe you feel the need to remind others, and now that you have done so please refrain from further spam. well again that depend on other when they make it clear they don't get then they will reminded yes along with yourself and other sadly that is the way the usenet works Again, your use of the English language is a bit ... vague. hardly vauge at all I assume that English is your primary language, right? you are then truly an assume Does your news reader have a spelling checker on/in it? no Have you ever used such a subprogram? yes If not I'd like to suggest that you become familiar with its use. why? Once again, I'd try and explain it but I don't think I could keep the words small enough for you. Your spelling is absolutely atrocious, your syntax is worse, and this combines to make your posts nearly unreadable. then don't read it if you like You replied to my post dude, not the other way around. Its not really a difficult concept to grasp, and the program is quite intuitive. Its built for those who cannot spell, in other words for someone just like yourself (and I to be honest, but I have learned to use my spell-checkers). the question is why bother the only people that complain seem to be folks Id perfer to anoy rather than spend any extra effort trying to please Ahh, so you are here for no other reason than to annoy others. I get it now. Here in Usenet we call individuals like that "flamers", and in the HAM world we call them assholes. it seems and to the point if other parties would demostrate they finaly understand then then a repeat will not be needed Same at ya big guy. HUH? Point, game, match. based on past performance I don't even if they understand that it will last at all indeed as certain of those that seem to need reminders are the subjects of FCC enforcement actions I help to generate I sadly expect that they will ned more remidners in the near future but that is up to them Ron You you feel that you are the one, the best qualified, to provide these "reminders"? aboslotely How so? by being so Are you the worlds foremost user of code? no why do you ask? indeed I can't use it all If so then I dearly hope you spell better in code than you do here. why would I want t use to code? Check the name of the thread. " an ontopic post about code" Imagine the bad name you give to other HAM's with your spelling. no you give a bad name to hams by showing youself to be an asshole I freely admit I'm an asshole, and I don't have a problem with it. I can be an asshole here and be amongst a great number of them, therefore being nearly unheard. In the HAM world, well lets just say that in the local crowd I am far more cordial that you have shown yourself to be here. indeed as the targt of the remarks that indicate the need for a reminder I am thealmost the only one in the world able to ntice With the sad state of your command of the English language I'd suspect any claim that you generated an FCC action. ah now you are just being insultingand foolish Honest, not insulting. no insulting the receiver gets to decide that If you are willing to equate honesty with insulting then I cant imagine what else you are willing to do to get your need to be the victim full filled. Please, review your posts to me in this thread. why? Once again, I'd try and explain it but I don't think I could keep the words small enough for you. Read them one word at a time and then get back to me. why? Can you honestly say that they make sense? yes Maybe I'm wrong then, maybe English is not your native tongue. That would explain your inability to write it coherently. That the spelling is above par for an individual who's primary language is reported to be English? huh? Kindly allow the individual to whom I posted the original "post" to answer. alow myself to post? how could I stopp anyone form posting indeed If I had that power I would used it and if I had the power to stop someone from posting no one would need remeinding Actually, unless you use more than one name/account to post with, the original individual I was posting to goes by the name of ". I do your point The current account you are posting from is ". Significant difference there, don't you think? no they are the same person Ahh, so you post from multiple accounts. Interesting. Honesty is not your forte I take it. Assuming that your account name here corresponds to a HAM call, then it would be even more simple to assume that anyone named Brian, residing in Florida, speaks English as his first language. well brain does not live in florida he lives in PA and lies to the fcc I'm sure "brain" does, but Brian is reported to be in Florida. And lying to the FCC is a very bad idea. Specially if one wants to keep one's HAM license. If he can that is. Somehow I doubt that anything beyond spam is a reach for him. HUH? I'd explain it, but I don't think I could keep the words small enough for you. back to ad homin attack and insult boring Nothing ad-hominem about it. Accurate and to the point. Something you have taken great pains to prove for me. Ron |
|
#60
February 15th 09, 12:36 AM
posted to alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
an ontopic post about code
wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:03:04 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:33:38 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:13:35 -0600, Ron wrote: wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:52:18 -0600, Ron Once again, I'd try and explain it but I don't think I could keep the words small enough for you. meaning youintent was to be insulting nothing more try being honest Oh no, this time you got it 100% correct. But then again so did I. Your spelling is absolutely atrocious, your syntax is worse, and this combines to make your posts nearly unreadable. then don't read it if you like You replied to my post dude, not the other way around. you started the exachane and again if you don't like what reading my post ypost you don't have to I OTOH will contiue to reply to whatever posts I wish however I wish Its not really a difficult concept to grasp, and the program is quite intuitive. Its built for those who cannot spell, in other words for someone just like yourself (and I to be honest, but I have learned to use my spell-checkers). the question is why bother the only people that complain seem to be folks Id perfer to anoy rather than spend any extra effort trying to please Ahh, so you are here for no other reason than to annoy others. lying again Not really, just paraphrasing your response. but it is tru I don't cae if you and/or others are anoyed if you understood enligh you understand that difference If you wrote English it sure would make it easier to understand your meaning. now. Here in Usenet we call individuals like that "flamers", and in the HAM world we call them assholes. lkike yourself asshole you want to control and any other I saimply don't care one or the other and I certainly don't care enough to spend extra to avoid anoying asshole like you Like I said, I freely admit I'm an asshole. And now its your turn. why would I want t use to code? Check the name of the thread. " an ontopic post about code" again what was your point that I am talking about code and it effects has nothing to do with wanintg to use code You weren't talking about code, as far as I could tell you were not talking about anything. Just spamming. indeed seeing the effect on so many brain I should no sane person would risk using code Imagine the bad name you give to other HAM's with your spelling. no you give a bad name to hams by showing youself to be an asshole I freely admit I'm an asshole, and I don't have a problem with it. so why are you whining? Being an asshole is far better than being a spamming asshole. I can be an asshole here and be amongst a great number of them, therefore being nearly unheard. In the HAM world, well lets just say that in the local crowd I am far more cordial that you have shown yourself to be here. so? indeed as the targt of the remarks that indicate the need for a reminder I am thealmost the only one in the world able to ntice With the sad state of your command of the English language I'd suspect any claim that you generated an FCC action. ah now you are just being insultingand foolish Honest, not insulting. no insulting the receiver gets to decide that If you are willing to equate honesty with insulting then I cant imagine what else you are willing to do to get your need to be the victim full filled. bioing crow realy boring And in English that means? you are not being honest just insulting and dishoenst iondeed I gather you hardly understand what honsty isd Please, review your posts to me in this thread. why? Once again, I'd try and explain it but I don't think I could keep the words small enough for you. again you reveal you are just being insulting know what is written as you Read them one word at a time and then get back to me. why? Can you honestly say that they make sense? yes Maybe I'm wrong then, maybe English is not your native tongue. That would explain your inability to write it coherently. such is not required Only to you. indeed in making you work for the meaning youwill value it more hence incoherent writing is more usefull trhat is the sort of thing that the coders were in fact pushing That the spelling is above par for an individual who's primary language is reported to be English? huh? Kindly allow the individual to whom I posted the original "post" to answer. alow myself to post? how could I stopp anyone form posting indeed If I had that power I would used it and if I had the power to stop someone from posting no one would need remeinding Actually, unless you use more than one name/account to post with, the original individual I was posting to goes by the name of ". I do your point The current account you are posting from is ". Significant difference there, don't you think? no they are the same person Ahh, so you post from multiple accounts. Interesting. why do you I don't, and that is only a part of what makes me honest. Give it a try guy, you might find it refreshing. Assuming that your account name here corresponds to a HAM call, then it would be even more simple to assume that anyone named Brian, residing in Florida, speaks English as his first language. well brain does not live in florida he lives in PA and lies to the fcc I'm sure "brain" does, but Brian is reported to be in Florida. but he does no t And lying to the FCC is a very bad idea. sadly facts have proven that not to be and Lying to the FCC is all but rutine and gos unpunished Until such time as someone makes the lies known to the FCC. Then ... well lets just say that the letters start. as witnessed by crow himself Specially if one wants to keep one's HAM license. who is going to take it ? the FCC? bah If he can that is. Somehow I doubt that anything beyond spam is a reach for him. HUH? I'd explain it, but I don't think I could keep the words small enough for you. back to ad homin attack and insult boring Nothing ad-hominem about it. nothing about such stop lying and try being honest or me. Ron Try looking up the meaning of the term. Get back to me when you get done. Ron |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
| You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
| Want Money? Try this Out | CB | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Linear Mode
